Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges
- PMID: 38079242
- DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000646
Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges
Abstract
The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.
Copyright © 2023 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
Conflict of interest statement
J.E.D. and A.H. are employees of Sight Sciences, Inc. T.W.S. is a consultant and an investigator for Glaukos, as well as other canal device conflicting companies such as Alcon Surgical, Ivantis, Sight Science, Vialase, Elios, Belkin Vision, and New World Medical. The remaining authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090.
-
- Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363:1711–1720.
-
- Zhang X, Song Y, Liebmann J, et al. A modified technique in applying sponge soaked with mitomycin C in trabeculectomy. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021;10:548–552.
-
- Dawson EF, Culpepper BE, Bolch CA, et al. Comparison of outcomes following glaucoma drainage tube surgery between primary and secondary glaucomas, and between phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021;10:553–563.
-
- Baudouin C, Labbe A, Liang H, et al. Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:312–334.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical