Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;58(2):236-241.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00592-4. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

Delivering Digital Health Solutions that Patients Need: A Call to Action

Veronica Popa  1 , Jan Geissler  2 , Rebecca Vermeulen  3 , Elizabeth Priest  4 , Katherine Capperella  5 , Gözde Susuzlu  6 , Sharon F Terry  7 , Nicholas Brooke  8
Affiliations

Delivering Digital Health Solutions that Patients Need: A Call to Action

Veronica Popa et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Digital health solutions have the potential to complement traditional healthcare approaches and deliver improved health outcomes, but there are system-wide challenges that need to be addressed. These include fragmentation of the digital health landscape, regulatory processes that lack the agility to accommodate the fast pace of digital health advances, and inadequate transparency around data sharing and data governance. All of these challenges have led to mistrust, limited understanding and sharing of best practices, a lack of digital education and awareness, and insufficient patient and public engagement and involvement. In this paper, we argue that for digital health solutions to fulfil their potential, there needs to be a significant increase in early, meaningful, and sustained engagement with the people they intend to benefit. The uptake as well as the impact of digital solutions created in partnership with patients for patients are greater and more relevant to the communities they address.

Keywords: Digital data governance; Digital health; Patient engagement; Patient involvement; Patient-centric design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RV is an employee of Roche, California, USA; KC was an employee of Johnson & Johnson, Pennsylvania, USA (at the time of manuscript development). All other authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to declare. The views and opinions by the authors here do not reflect the opinions of their respective organizations. They reflect personal accounts from the varied expertise and perspectives.

References

    1. Baumann LA, Reinhold AK, Brütt AL. Public and patient involvement in health policy decision-making on the health system level—a scoping review. Health Policy. 2022;126:1023–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geissler J, Ryll B, di Priolo SL, Uhlenhopp M. Improving patient involvement in medicines research and development: a practical roadmap. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;51:612–619. doi: 10.1177/2168479017706405. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason-Lai P, Vandall-Walker V. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levitan B, Getz K, Eisenstein EL, et al. Assessing the financial value of patient engagement: a quantitative approach from CTTI’s patient groups and clinical trials project. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52:220–229. doi: 10.1177/2168479017716715. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forsythe LP, Carman KL, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff. 2019;38:359–367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067. - DOI - PubMed