Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;51(5):1383-1394.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06547-z. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor in solid tumors-a comprehensive analysis of imaging findings and comparison with histopathology

Affiliations

CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor in solid tumors-a comprehensive analysis of imaging findings and comparison with histopathology

Niklas Dreher et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in various solid cancers and can be targeted by CXCR4-directed molecular imaging. We aimed to characterize the in-vivo CXCR4 expression in patients affected with solid tumors, along with a comparison to ex-vivo findings.

Methods: A total 142 patients with 23 different histologically proven solid tumors were imaged with CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor (total number of scans, 152). A semi-quantitative analysis of the CXCR4-positive tumor burden including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratios (TBR) using blood pool was conducted. In addition, we performed histopathological staining to determine the immuno-reactive score (IRS) from patients' tumor tissue and investigated possible correlations with SUVmax (by providing Spearman's rho ρ). Based on imaging, we also assessed the eligibility for CXCR4-targeted radioligand therapy or non-radioactive CXCR4 inhibitory treatment (defined as more than five CXCR4-avid target lesions [TL] with SUVmax above 10).

Results: One hundred three of 152 (67.8%) scans showed discernible uptake above blood pool (TBR > 1) in 462 lesions (52 primary tumors and 410 metastases). Median TBR was 4.4 (1.05-24.98), thereby indicating high image contrast. The highest SUVmax was observed in ovarian cancer, followed by small cell lung cancer, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and adrenocortical carcinoma. When comparing radiotracer accumulation between primary tumors and metastases for the entire cohort, comparable SUVmax was recorded (P > 0.999), except for pulmonal findings (P = 0.013), indicative for uniform CXCR4 expression among TL. For higher IRS, a weak, but statistically significant correlation with increased SUVmax was observed (ρ = 0.328; P = 0.018). In 42/103 (40.8%) scans, more than five TL were recorded, with 12/42 (28.6%) exhibiting SUVmax above 10, suggesting eligibility for CXCR4-targeted treatment in this subcohort.

Conclusions: In a whole-body tumor read-out, a substantial portion of prevalent solid tumors demonstrated increased and uniform [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor uptake, along with high image contrast. We also observed a respective link between in- and ex-vivo CXCR4 expression, suggesting high specificity of the PET agent. Last, a fraction of patients with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor-positive tumor burden were rendered potentially suitable for CXCR4-directed therapy.

Keywords: C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4; CXCR4; PET/CT; Radioligand therapy; Solid tumors; Theranostics; [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RAW and AKB have received speaker honoraria from PentixaPharm and are involved in [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET imaging in marginal zone lymphoma (LYMFOR). AKB is a member of the advisory board of PentixaPharm. All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest as well as consent for scientific analysis and publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor in different solid tumor entities. Maximum intensity projections (MIP) are displayed. Red arrows highlight CXCR4-positive tumor lesions. ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; NEN, neuroendocrine neoplasia; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma. *Not otherwise specified
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of the quantitative tumor burden analysis of [68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET. Boxplots and whiskers display median and range of SUVmax (A) and TBR (B) for the examined entities. Quantities for all lesions per tumor entity are presented. ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; CCC, cholangiocellular carcinoma; DSRCT, desmoplastic small round cell tumor; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NEN, neuroendocrine neoplasia; NSCLC, non-small lung cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma. *Not otherwise specified
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
[.68 Ga]Ga-PentixaFor uptake in sites of disease across different compartments. A SUVmax and B TBR. Boxplots display median and interquartile range. Whiskers display 5–95 percentile range. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between immunoreactive score (IRS) and PET parameters. A SUVmax, B SUVmean, and C SUVpeak. Spearman’s rho and p-values are reported in the graphs
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Concordance of CXCR4-directed immunohistochemistry (IHC) and [.68 Ga]Ga-pentixfor PET/CT. Patient with adrenal cortical carcinoma demonstrated increased uptake in sites of disease on maximum intensity projection (MIP, A) and transaxial PET/CT (B), along with high CXCR4 expression on IHC staining (C). SUVmax was 26.9 (TBR: 16.8) and respective immuno-reactive score (IRS) was 12. Patient in B was diagnosed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma, demonstrating no relevant uptake in the primary (D, E SUVmax, 5.5; TBR: 2.5). IHC also revealed no relevant CXCR4 expression (IRS, 1). Magnification of IHC: × 400

References

    1. Domanska UM, Kruizinga RC, Nagengast WB, Timmer-Bosscha H, Huls G, de Vries EG, et al. A review on CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in oncology: no place to hide. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:219–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burger JA, Peled A. CXCR4 antagonists: targeting the microenvironment in leukemia and other cancers. Leukemia. 2009;23:43–52. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.299. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee S, Behnam Azad B, Nimmagadda S. The intricate role of CXCR4 in cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2014;124:31–82. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-411638-2.00002-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demmer O, Gourni E, Schumacher U, Kessler H, Wester HJ. PET imaging of CXCR4 receptors in cancer by a new optimized ligand. ChemMedChem. 2011;6:1789–1791. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201100320. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philipp-Abbrederis K, Herrmann K, Knop S, Schottelius M, Eiber M, Luckerath K, et al. In vivo molecular imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7:477–487. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404698. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms