Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 11;24(1):799.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07831-x.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study-protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study-protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial

Edward L Snyder et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies.

Methods: ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (> 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%.

Discussion: RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Amustaline/GSH; Cardiac surgery; INTERCEPT; Pathogen reduction; Randomized controlled trial; Transfusion-transmitted infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RJB, KL, SB, JPP, NM, LC, and JV are employees and shareholders of Cerus Corporation equity, the Sponsor of the study. The investigators are independent of the Sponsor and declare no relevant conflict of interest. ELS, MES, IJW, YT, NRS, TMB, JPRP, JDG, JSM, RMS, RGP, GAN, RS, TBR, AK, RD, TS, PB, and IL-P are site investigators on the study, receive no compensation from the Sponsor and declare no conflicts relating to the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study timeline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort diagram of study flow

References

    1. Godbey EA, Thibodeaux SR. Ensuring safety of the blood supply in the United States: Donor screening, testing, emerging pathogens, and pathogen inactivation. Semin Hematol. 2019;56(4):229–235. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2019.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stramer SL. Current perspectives in transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases: emerging and re-emerging infections. ISBT Sci Ser. 2014;9(1):30–36. doi: 10.1111/voxs.12070. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haass KA, Sapiano MRP, Savinkina A, Kuehnert MJ, Basavaraju SV. Transfusion-Transmitted Infections Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module. Transfus Med Rev. 2019;33(2):84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallian P, Pouchol E, Djoudi R, Lhomme S, Mouna L, Gross S, et al. Transfusion-Transmitted Hepatitis E Virus Infection in France. Transfus Med Rev. 2019;33(3):146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kopolovic I, Ostro J, Tsubota H, Lin Y, Cserti-Gazdewich CM, Messner HA, et al. A systematic review of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2015;126(3):406–414. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-620872. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances