Considerations for the design of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for clinical development: lessons learned
- PMID: 38087293
- PMCID: PMC10717055
- DOI: 10.1186/s13045-023-01519-0
Considerations for the design of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) for clinical development: lessons learned
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy that has successfully reached patient treatment in different clinical scenarios. ADCs are formed by an antibody against a specific tumor-associated antigen (TAA), a cytotoxic payload, and a chemical linker that binds both. To this regard, most efforts have been focused on target identification, antibody design and linker optimization, but other relevant aspects for clinical development have not received the necessary attention. In this article using data from approved ADCs, we evaluated all characteristics of these agents, including payload physicochemical properties, in vitro potency, drug antibody ratio (DAR), exposure-response relationships, and clinical development strategies. We suggest that compounds with best options for clinical development include those with optimal payload physicochemical properties and cleavable linkers that would lead to a bystander effect. These modalities can facilitate the development of ADCs in indications with low expression of the TAA. Early clinical development strategies including changes in the schedule of administration with more frequent doses are also discussed in the context of an efficient strategy. In conclusion, we highlight relevant aspects that are needed for the optimal development of ADCs in cancer, proposing options for improvement.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
A. O: Consultant fee from NMS. Former consultant of Servier, WWIT and CancerAppy. Former employee of Symphogen. V. M: reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Janssen, and Pieris outside the submitted work. P. P: Consultant for: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD. Speaker’s Bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD. Employee of: None. Grant/Research support from (Clinical Trials): Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MSD. Travel Academic work Fees from: Merck, MSD and Bristol-Myers Squibb. E. C. reports grants and personal fees from Astellas, Novartis, Nanobiotix, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, PsiOxus Therapeutics, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seattle Genetics, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Servier, Celgene, AbbVie, Amcure, Alkermes, PharmaMar, and BeiGene, personal fees from GLG, Medscape, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Cerulean Pharma, EUSA, Gehrmann Consulting, Guidepoint, and OncoDNA, and grants from ACEO, Adaptimmune, AMGEN, CytomX, GlaxoSmithKline, H3,Incyte, Kura, Lilly, Nektar, Loxo, MacroGenics, Menarini, Merus, Principia, PUMA, Sanofi, Taiho, Tesaro, Transgene, Takeda, Inovio, MSD, Mersana Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, ORCA, Boston Therapeutics, Dynavax Technologies, Debiopharm, Regeneron, Millennium, Synthon, Spectrum, and Rigontec outside the submitted work. F. M: Former employee of Entrechem. Employee of CancerAppy. No competing interests to declare in relation to this work.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
