Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 12;42(1):140.
doi: 10.1186/s41043-023-00483-2.

Establishing performance standards for child development: learnings from the ECDI2030

Affiliations

Establishing performance standards for child development: learnings from the ECDI2030

Nicole Petrowski et al. J Health Popul Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Standards of early childhood development (ECD) are needed to determine whether children living in different contexts are developmentally on track. The Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI2030) is a population-level measure intended to be used in household surveys to collect globally comparable data on one of the indicators chosen to monitor progress toward target 4.2 of the Sustainable Development Goals: The proportion of children aged 24-59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being.

Methods: To define performance cut-scores for the ECDI2030 we followed a criterion-referenced standard setting exercise using the modified Angoff method. The exercise gauged the expectations from 15 global experts in ECD and was informed by representative population data collected in Mexico and the State of Palestine. The final calibrated age-specific performance cut-scores were applied to these data to estimate the proportion of children developmentally on track, disaggregated by background characteristics, including the child's sex and attendance to early childhood education.

Results: Through a process of standard setting, we generated robust performance standards for the ECDI2030 by establishing five age-specific cut-scores to identify children as developmentally on track.

Conclusions: This paper demonstrated how the standard setting methodology, typically applied to measures in the health and education fields, could be applied to a measure of child development. By creating robust criterion-referenced standards, we have been able to ensure that the cut-scores related to age for the ECDI2030 are based on performance standards set by global experts in the ECD field for defining on and off track development.

Keywords: Child development; Measurement; Performance standards; SDGs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example ECDI2030 items
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subject Matter experts’ recommended cut-scores by age and round
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of children developmentally on track according to cut-scores for Round 1 and Round 2 in Mexico and State of Palestine, by age
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ECDI2030 score distribution and age-specific cut-scores, Mexico
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
ECDI2030 score distribution and age-specific cut-scores, State of Palestine

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Educational Research Association. American Psychological Association. National Council on Measurement in Education . Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
    1. Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL, editor. Educational measurement. 2. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1971. pp. 508–600.
    1. Cappa C, Petrowski N, De Castro EF, Geisen E, LeBaron P, Allen-Leigh B, et al. Identifying and minimizing errors in the measurement of early childhood development: lessons learned from the cognitive testing of the ECDI2030. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212181. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cizek GJ. Setting performance standards: foundations, methods, and innovations. 2. London: Routledge; 2012.
    1. Cizek GJ, Bunch MB. Standard setting: a guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd; 2007.

Publication types