Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;9(5-6):152-157.
doi: 10.1159/000534184. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

Outcomes after Proton Beam Irradiation in Patients with Choroidal Melanoma Eligible for Investigational AU-011 Treatment

Affiliations

Outcomes after Proton Beam Irradiation in Patients with Choroidal Melanoma Eligible for Investigational AU-011 Treatment

Frances Wu et al. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Vision loss is common in patients treated with radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. With proton beam irradiation (PBI), the prescribed dose is delivered to the tumor with a sharp dose reduction outside the target volume. However, radiation complications are likely to develop when tumors are located near the optic nerve or fovea. Treatment with light-activated AU-011 (belzupacap sarotalocan), an investigational drug which specifically targets tumor cells, may avoid these complications. We evaluated outcomes in a historical group of patients who fit eligibility criteria for AU-011 therapy and were treated with PBI.

Methods: A consecutive series of patients who received PBI for small choroidal melanoma at a single center between 1986 and 2016 were identified. Consistent with eligibility criteria in clinical trials of AU-011, patients were included when tumor dimensions did not exceed 2.5 mm in maximum thickness and 10.0 mm in largest basal diameter (LBD). Snellen visual acuities were converted to logMAR for analysis. Visual acuity outcomes were analyzed in patients with an initial acuity of logMAR 0.7 or better (equivalent to Snellen 20/100). Rates of visual acuity loss and mortality were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acuity loss by tumor location was compared using log-rank testing. Rates of tumor recurrence, neovascular glaucoma (NVG), and eye loss were also described.

Results: Two hundred and 22 patients were included in the study. The median age was 60.7 years (range 21.3-94.8 years). Median tumor thickness was 2.0 mm (range 1.2-2.5 mm), and median LBD was 8.0 mm (range 4.0-10.0 mm). Median follow-up was 6.9 years (range 1.0-30.2 years). In 204 patients with a baseline logMAR visual acuity of 0.7 or better, the mean baseline acuity was 0.15 (equivalent to Snellen 20/25), which decreased to 0.52 (approximately Snellen 20/70) by 5 years after PBI. Visual outcomes were significantly worse for patients with tumors located within 3 mm of the optic disc and/or fovea. Tumor recurrence (1.4%), NVG (4.5%), and eye loss (2.7%) were uncommon.

Discussion: Despite the advantageous dose distribution of protons, over half of patients with small choroidal melanomas located near the optic disc or fovea had a visual acuity equivalent to 20/80 or worse at 5 years after PBI. Treatment with AU-011 may allow better vision preservation in small tumors that carry a high risk of vision loss with radiotherapy.

Keywords: Choroidal melanoma; Oncology; Radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Kim receives research support as a clinical trial investigator for Aura Biosciences. Dr. Gragoudas is a consultant for Aura Biosciences.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean logMAR visual acuity at years 0–5 after proton beam therapy. Among patients starting with logMAR acuity of 0.7 or better (equivalent to Snellen 20/100), the mean baseline acuity was logMAR 0.15 (Snellen 20/25). The mean acuity progressively declined to logMAR 0.52 (approximately Snellen 20/70) by 5 years after PBI.

References

    1. Gragoudas ES, Seddon JM, Egan K, Glynn R, Munzenrider J, Austin-Seymour M, et al. . Long-term results of proton beam irradiated uveal melanomas. Ophthalmology. 1987 Apr;94(4):349–53. - PubMed
    1. Reichstein DA, Brock AL. Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 1;32(3):183–90. - PubMed
    1. Jampol LM, Moy CS, Murray TG, Reynolds SM, Albert DM, Schachat AP, et al. . The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: IV. Local treatment failure and enucleation in the first 5 years after brachytherapy. COMS report No. 19. Ophthalmology. 2020 Apr;127(4S):S148–57. - PubMed
    1. Aziz HA, Singh N, Bena J, Wilkinson A, Singh AD. Vision loss following episcleral brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: development of a vision prognostication tool. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):615–20. - PubMed
    1. Finger PT, Chin KJ, Yu GP; Palladium-103 for Choroidal Melanoma Study Group . Risk factors for radiation maculopathy after ophthalmic plaque radiation for choroidal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):608–15. - PubMed