Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments
- PMID: 38093090
- DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00652-9
Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments
Abstract
Background and objective: In recent years, the mission of pharmacists has evolved and the model of the caregiver-patient relationship has been challenged by a new patient-centered approach. A challenge to providing personalized care is the assessment of patient preferences. We aimed to systematically identify published discrete choice experiments related to patient preferences for pharmacy services and to assess the quality of the selected articles.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in two databases (PubMed and Embase, until March 2023) according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. The quality of the selected articles was assessed according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research conjoint analysis checklist.
Results: Among the 421 articles identified, 16 published studies were included and analyzed. They were mostly published in pharmaceutical (n = 6), economic (n = 4), and public health (n = 4) journals. Only two articles concerned the field of hospital pharmacy. Only five presented the specific pharmacy service studied: filling of prescriptions, management of symptoms, treatment delivery, and components of pharmacist counseling. Five articles focused on pharmacy services related to a specific disease. None fully fulfilled the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research checklist, only partially fulfilled.
Conclusions: According to the identified studies, cost, time, logistics (organizational criteria), and pharmacists' courtesy and skills were consistently cited as factors influencing patient preferences for pharmacy services. The disclosure of patient preferences is a complex and under-researched topic, especially in the field of pharmacy, but interest is growing. As the mission of pharmacists evolves to bring them closer to patients, the better understanding of patient preferences in pharmacy services will allow for better targeting and better integration of patient profiles in patient management.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):961-76. doi: 10.2165/11594350-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22823521
-
Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Feb;21(1):3-19. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12002. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Int J Pharm Pract. 2013. PMID: 23301529 Review.
-
Patient preferences for objective quality metrics during community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):641-649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019. PMID: 30143466
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacist services.Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Sep 30;31(5):459-471. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad052. Int J Pharm Pract. 2023. PMID: 37543960
Cited by
-
Construction and validation of an instrument to identify barriers to implementing pharmaceutical care.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Oct 18;16:100529. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100529. eCollection 2024 Dec. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024. PMID: 39512514 Free PMC article.
-
Research on the impact of hospital organizational behavior on physicians'patient-centered care.Arch Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;83(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01620-5. Arch Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40500787 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Epstein R, Street R. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:100–3. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1239 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Van der Heide I, Snoeijs S, Quattrini S, Struckmann V, Hujala A, Schellevis F. Patient-centeredness of integrated care programs for people with multimorbidity: results from the European ICARE4EU project. Health Policy. 2018;122:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.005 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mossialos E, Courtin E, Naci H, Benrimoj S, Bouvy M, Farris K. From, “retailers” to health care providers: Transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management. Health Policy. 2015;119:628–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.007 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barnett K, Mercer S, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: A cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Coste J, Valderas J, Carcaillon-Bentata L. Estimating and characterizing the burden of multimorbidity in the community: a comprehensive multistep analysis of two large nationwide representative surveys in France. PLoS Med. 2021;18: e1003584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003584 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials