Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 12;11(12):E1161-E1167.
doi: 10.1055/a-2201-6928. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Management of foreign body ingestion in adults: Time to STOP and rethink endoscopy

Affiliations

Management of foreign body ingestion in adults: Time to STOP and rethink endoscopy

George Tambakis et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims Foreign body ingestion is a common cause for Emergency Department presentation. In adults, foreign body ingestion is more common in patients with underlying psychiatric comorbidity, the elderly, alcohol intoxication, and in prisoners. This study reviewed the management of patients presenting to a tertiary hospital with foreign body ingestion. Patients and methods A retrospective review of patients presenting with foreign body ingestion to a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, was undertaken from January 2017 to December 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, type of foreign body, length of stay, imaging modalities, management strategies, and complications. High-risk ingestion was defined as sharp objects, length >5 cm, diameter >2.5 cm, button battery and/or magnet ingestion or esophageal as per international guidelines. Results A total of 157 presentations by 63 patients with foreign body ingestion occurred between 2017 and 2021 (50% male; median age 30 years). Of the patients, 56% had underlying psychiatric comorbidities. The majority of presentations occurred in prisoners (65%). The most commonly ingested objects were batteries (23%), alleged drug-containing balloons (17%), razor blades (16%), and miscellaneous (40%). High-risk ingestion occurred in approximately two-thirds of presentations. Conservative management was the most common approach in 55% of patients. Complications, defined as perforation, bowel obstruction or fistula formation, did not occur in this cohort despite more than half presenting with high-risk ingestions. Thirty-day re-presentation rates were high (31%) and that was most common in patients with intentional ingestion, underlying mental health disorders, and a documented history of self-harm. Conclusions Conservative management for patients presenting with recurrent high-risk foreign body ingestion was safe in appropriately selected cases. Re-presentation is common and poses significant challenges for health care providers.

Keywords: Foreign bodies; GI surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 27-year-old male prisoner ingested a 35-cm television cable. He was managed conservatively and the object passed 3 weeks after ingestion.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 20-year-old non-binary person with recurrent presentations ingested a metal spoon and, as part of a behavioral management approach, was initially managed conservatively. After the spoon failed to pass on serial imaging, endoscopy was attempted. At endoscopy, the spoon was lodged in the duodenal cap with erosion into the duodenal wall at both ends, such that it could not be removed endoscopically. The patient proceeded to surgery.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proposed management of recurrent high-risk foreign body ingestion.

References

    1. Cevik M, Gókdemir MT, Boleken ME et al.The characteristics and outcomes of foreign body ingestion and aspiration in children due to lodged foreign body in the aerodigestive tract. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:53–57. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b5374. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poynter BA, Hunter JJ, Coverdale JH et al.Hard to swallow: a systematic review of deliberate foreign body ingestion. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33:518–524. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.06.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpi A, Laforgia R, Lozito C et al.Ingestion of foreign bodies among prisoners: a ten years retrospective study at University Hospital of Southern Italy. G Chir. 2017;38:80–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH et al.Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48:489–496. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M et al.Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:869–875. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed