Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jan 10;68(1):e0077823.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00778-23. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

Oteseconazole versus fluconazole for the treatment of severe vulvovaginal candidiasis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Oteseconazole versus fluconazole for the treatment of severe vulvovaginal candidiasis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 trial

Xiaoqian Wang et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common condition among women. Fluconazole remains the dominant treatment option for VVC. Oteseconazole is a highly selective inhibitor of fungal CYP51. This randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oteseconazole compared with fluconazole in treating severe VVC. Female subjects presenting with vulvovaginal signs and symptoms score of ≥7 and positive Candida infection determined by potassium hydroxide test or Gram staining were randomly assigned to receive oteseconazole (600 mg on D1 and 450 mg on D2) or fluconazole (150 mg on D1 and D4) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving therapeutic cure [defined as achieving both clinical cure (absence of signs and symptoms of VVC) and mycological cure (negative culture of Candida species)] at D28. A total of 322 subjects were randomized and 321 subjects were treated. At D28, a statistically significantly higher proportion of subjects achieved therapeutic cure in the oteseconazole group than in the fluconazole group (66.88% vs 45.91%; P = 0.0002). Oteseconazole treatment resulted in an increased proportion of subjects achieving mycological cure (82.50% vs 59.12%; P < 0.0001) and clinical cure (71.25% vs 55.97%; P = 0.0046) compared with fluconazole. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the two groups. No subjects discontinued study treatment or withdrew study due to adverse events. Oteseconazole showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful superiority over fluconazole for the treatment of severe VVC and was generally tolerated.

Keywords: Candida albicans; Candida glabrata; fluconazole; oteseconazole; severe vulvovaginal candidiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Quanren Wang and Fang Wang are employees of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. No potential conflicts of interest are reported by other authors.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Subject disposition. Abbreviations: N, number of subjects; mITT, modified intention-to-treat.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Efficacy results at D28 in the mITT population (a), at D28 in the mITT subpopulation with positive culture for Candida albicans (b), at D14 in the mITT population (c),and at D14 in the mITT subpopulation with positive culture for Candida albicans (d). Abbreviation: mITT, modified intention-to-treat.

References

    1. Sobel JD. 2007. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet 369:1961–1971. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60917-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yano J, Sobel JD, Nyirjesy P, Sobel R, Williams VL, Yu Q, Noverr MC, Fidel PL. 2019. Current patient perspectives of vulvovaginal candidiasis: Incidence, symptoms, management and post-treatment outcomes. BMC Womens Health 19:48. doi:10.1186/s12905-019-0748-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gonçalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT, Henriques M, Azeredo J, Silva S. 2016. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol 42:905–927. doi:10.3109/1040841X.2015.1091805 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denning DW, Kneale M, Sobel JD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. 2018. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 18:e339–e347. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30103-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G, Mendling W, Jensen JS. 2018. European (IUSTI/WHO) International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS 29:1258–1272. doi:10.1177/0956462418785451 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources