Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 May 1;119(5):910-921.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002621. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results of the UNIFI Long-Term Maintenance Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis Through 4 Years: Final Results of the UNIFI Long-Term Maintenance Study

Waqqas Afif et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic condition that may require long-term treatment. We report the final efficacy and safety results of the UNIFI long-term extension study of ustekinumab in patients with UC through 4 years.

Methods: Ustekinumab induction responders who completed 44 weeks of maintenance treatment and agreed to enter the long-term extension continued their subcutaneous maintenance therapy (90 mg ustekinumab every 8 or 12 weeks [q8w or q12w] or placebo). Starting at week 56, randomized patients could receive dose adjustment to 90 mg q8w. Symptoms and adverse events were assessed through the study; endoscopic assessment was conducted at week 200.

Results: Of the 348 patients randomized to subcutaneous ustekinumab at maintenance baseline (q8w and q12w combined), 55.2% were in symptomatic remission at week 200. A greater proportion of biologic-naive patients (67.2% [117/174]) were in symptomatic remission than those with a history of biologic failure (41.6% [67/161]). Among patients in symptomatic remission at week 200, 96.4% were corticosteroid-free. Of the 171 patients with endoscopic evaluation at week 200, 81.6% (71/87) in the q12w group and 79.8% (67/84) in the q8w group had endoscopic improvement. From weeks 156 to the final safety visit (up to week 220), no deaths, major adverse cardiovascular events, or tuberculosis occurred in patients receiving ustekinumab. Nasopharyngitis, UC worsening, and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequently reported adverse events.

Discussion: The long-term efficacy of ustekinumab maintenance in patients with UC was confirmed through 4 years. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02407236.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of the article: Waqqas Afif, MD.

Specific author contributions: W.A., R.P.A., M.T.A., S.D., W.J.S., R.P., T.H., E.J.S., R.W.L., D.S.R., L.P.-B., and B.E.S. participated in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafted/revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Y.M., H.Z., and C.M. participated in the conception and design of the study, participated in acquisition/collection of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted/revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Financial support: This work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Potential competing interests: W.A. reports having received speaker, advisory board member, and or clinical investigator for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Dynacare, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Sandoz, Sanofi, Takeda, and Theradiag. R.P.A. reports having received grant support and consulting fees from AbbVie, Dr Falk Pharma, and Janssen Research & Development, LLC. M.T.A. reports having received consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda, Focus Medical Communications, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Imedex, Cornerstone Health, Inc., UCB Biopharma SRL, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celsius. S.D. reports having received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Athos Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Gilead, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB Inc. and Vifor; and received lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Gilead, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, and Takeda. W.J.S. reports having received research grants from AbbVie, Abivax, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus Laboratories, Seres Therapeutics, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma; consulting fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Admirx, Alfasigma, Alimentiv, Alivio Therapeutics, Allakos, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Atlantic Pharmaceuticals, Bausch Health (Salix), Beigene, Bellatrix Pharmaceuticals, Biora (Progenity), Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Clostrabio, Codexis, Equillium, Forbion, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Immunic (Vital Therapies), Index Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Intact Therapeutics, Iota Biosciences, Janssen, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Kyverna Therapeutics, Landos Biopharma, Eli Lilly, Morphic Therapeutics, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Oppilan Pharma (now Ventyx Biosciences), Otsuka, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Pharm Olam, Polpharm, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, PTM Therapeutics, Quell Therapeutics, Reistone Biopharma, Seres Therapeutics, Shanghai Pharma Biotherapeutics, Shoreline Biosciences, Sublimity Therapeutics, Surrozen, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, Thetis Pharmaceuticals, Tillotts Pharma, Vedanta Biosciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Vimalan Biosciences, Vivelix Pharmaceuticals, Vividion Therapeutics, Vivreon Gastrosciences, Xencor, Zealand Pharma; stock or stock options from Allakos, BeiGene, Biora (Progenity), Gossamer Bio, Oppilan Pharma (now Ventyx Biosciences), Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagnoists Therapeutics, Shoreline Biosciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Vimalan Biosciences, Vivreon Gastrosciences; and employee at Shoreline Biosciences and Ventyx Biosciences. Spouse: Iveric Bio–consultant, stock options; Progenity–stock; Oppilan Pharma (now Ventyx Biosciences)–stock; Prometheus Biosciences–employee, stock, stock options; Prometheus Laboratories–stock, stock options, consultant, Ventyx Biosciences–stock, stock options; Vimalan Biosciences–stock. R.P. reports having received consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Abbivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Viatris, Ventyx, UCB; Speaker's Fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Takeda Pharmaceuticals and served on Advisory Boards for: AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Ventyx. T.H. reports having received grant support from AbbVie, Daiichi-Sankyo, EA Pharma Co, Ltd. JIMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; received consulting fees from EA Pharma Co, Ltd. and Janssen Research & Development, LLC.; and received lecture fees from AbbVie, EA Pharma Co, Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. E.J.S. reports having received grant support from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., New York Crohn's Foundation, Pfizer, UCB, Genentech, Seres Therapeutics, and Celgene; received consulting fees from AbbVie, Abgenomics, Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, Evidera, GI Health Foundation, Janssen, Protagonist, Seres, and Takeda Stock: Gilead; and received speaker fees from GI Health Foundation and Prime Therapeutics. R.W.L. reports having received advisory board fees from AbbVie, Aspen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Glutagen, Hospira, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and Takeda; received research grants from Celltrion, Shire, Janssen, Takeda, Joanna Tiddy grant from University of Sydney, McCusker Charitable Trust, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, NHMRC, Gutsy Group, and Pfizer. D.S.R. reports having received speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., and Emerge Health and served as an advisory board member for AbbVie and Janssen Research & Development, LLC. L.P.-B. reports having received personal fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Alma, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enterome, Enthera, Ferring, Fresenius, Genentech, Gilead, Hikma, Index Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, Mylan, Nestlé, Norgine, Oppilan Pharma, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Sterna, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Tillots, and Vifor; received grants from AbbVie, MSD, and Takeda; and received stock options from CTMA. Y.M., H.Z., and C.M. all are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC and own stock/stock options in Johnson & Johnson. B.E.S. reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Artugen Therapeutics, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion, ClostraBio, Equillium, Enthera, Evommune, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech (Roche), Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Index Pharmaceuticals, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Kaleido, Kallyope, Merck, Morphic Therapeutics, MRM Health, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonist Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, Sun Pharma, Surrozen, Target RWE, Teva, TLL Pharmaceutical, and Ventyx Biosciences; consulting and speaking fees from Abivax; consulting and speaking fees and other support from Eli Lilly; research grants, consulting and speaking fees and other support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda; research grants and consulting fees from Theravance Biopharma; and stock options from Ventyx Biopharma.

Writing assistance: Medical writing support was provided by Kristin Ruley Sharples, PhD, of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, under the direction of the authors in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines (Ann Inter Med. 2015;163:461-464) and was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.

Data transparency statement: The data sharing policy of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson is available at https://www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.

The authors thank the patients, investigators, and study personnel who made the UNIFI LTE possible. All authors had access to the study data and reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Symptomatic remissiona and corticosteroid-free symptomatic remissiona from maintenance baseline through week 200 for all ustekinumab IV induction responders randomized in the maintenance study (ITT analysis).b,c,d,e Symptomatic remission for the (a) overall population, (b) biologic-naive patients, and (c) patients with a history of biologic failure. Corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission for the (d) overall population, (e) biologic-naive patients, and (f) patients with a history of biologic failure. aSymptomatic remission was defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. bData are shown by randomized treatment group at maintenance week 0, regardless of whether patients received dose adjustment during the long-term extension. cPatients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. dPatients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or used a rescue medication after clinical flare, or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC before week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at every visit thereafter up to week 44. ePatients who had an ostomy or colectomy or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC after week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at every visit thereafter. AE, adverse event; ITT, intent-to-treat; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous, UC, ulcerative colitis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Symptomatic remissiona from week 44 to week 200 among patients randomized to ustekinumab at maintenance baseline and treated in the LTE using (a-c) nonresponder imputation analysis,b,c,d or (d-f) observed case analysise for the overall population, biologic-naive patients, and patients with a history of biologic failure. aSymptomatic remission was defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. bData are shown by randomized treatment group at maintenance week 0, regardless of whether patients received dose adjustment during the LTE. cPatients who had both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores missing at a visit were considered not to be in symptomatic remission for that visit. dPatients who had an ostomy or colectomy or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC after week 44 were considered not to be in symptomatic remission at every visit thereafter. eDenominator is number of patients with available data at each visit. AE, adverse event, LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; UC, ulcerative colitis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Full Mayo clinical remission, full Mayo clinical response, modified Mayo score response, and endoscopic improvement among patients with endoscopic evaluations at week 200 using (a) observed case analysis and (b) modified observed case analysis. Data are shown by randomized treatment group at maintenance week 0, regardless of whether patients received dose adjustment during the LTE. Full Mayo clinical remission was defined as a Mayo score ≤2 points, with no individual subscore >1. Full Mayo clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the total Mayo score by ≥ 30% and ≥3 points, with either a decrease from induction baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Modified Mayo score response was defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the modified Mayo score by ≥ 30% and ≥2 points, with either a decrease from induction baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic improvement was defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1. aIncludes data for patients who had endoscopic subscores at week 200. No imputation for missing data or treatment failure. bIncludes data for patients who had endoscopic subscores at week 200 or those who met treatment failure criteria. Patients who met treatment failure criteria (i.e., had an ostomy or colectomy or discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC before week 200) were not considered to have achieved the end point. AE, adverse event; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; UC, ulcerative colitis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Key safety events per 100 patient-years of follow-up for the first, second, third, and fourth years of ustekinumab maintenance therapy. aNumber of adverse events per 100 patient-years of follow-up and 95% CI (rates by each year of follow-up) in the combined ustekinumab ulcerative colitis safety cohort. CI were based on an exact method assuming that the observed number of events follows a Poisson distribution. bInfection as assessed by the investigator. c1st year includes the following: (i) patients who received ustekinumab SC (q8w or q12w) in the maintenance study with data from maintenance weeks 0 through 44; (ii) patients who were in full Mayo clinical response to ustekinumab IV induction dosing and received placebo SC on entry into this maintenance study with data from maintenance weeks 0 through 8. d2nd, 3rd, and 4th years include the following: (i) patients who were in full Mayo clinical response to ustekinumab IV induction dosing and were randomized to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q12w or q8w on entry into the maintenance study; (ii) patients who were in full Mayo clinical response to ustekinumab IV induction dosing, randomized to receive placebo SC on entry into the maintenance study, and had a dose adjustment to ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w, with data from the time of dose adjustment onward; and (iii) patients who were not in full Mayo clinical response to ustekinumab IV at induction week 8 but were in full Mayo clinical response at induction week 16 after an SC administration of ustekinumab at induction week 8 and received ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w on entry into the maintenance study. The 2nd year included data from week 44 through week 96, the 3rd year included data from week 96 through week 156, and the 4th year included data from week 156 through the final safety visit up to week 220. CI, confidence interval; IV, intravenous; LTE, long-term extension; q8w, every 8 weeks; q12w, every 12 weeks; SC, subcutaneous.

References

    1. Le Berre C, Ricciuto A, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Evolving short- and long-term goals of management of inflammatory bowel diseases: Getting it right, making it last. Gastroenterology 2022;162(5):1424–38. - PubMed
    1. Panaccione R, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, et al. Ustekinumab is effective and safe for ulcerative colitis through 2 years of maintenance therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020;52(11-12):1658–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abreu MT, Rowbotham DS, Danese S, et al. Efficacy and safety of maintenance ustekinumab for ulcerative colitis through 3 years: UNIFI long-term extension. J Crohns Colitis 2022;16(8):1222–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2019;381(13):1201–14. - PubMed
    1. Irvine EJ, Feagan B, Rochon J, et al. Quality of life: A valid and reliable measure of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Canadian Crohn’s relapse prevention trial study group. Gastroenterology 1994;106(2):287–96. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data