Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;150(2):107-116.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.3952.

Oncologic Safety of Close Margins in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Grade Major Salivary Gland Carcinoma

Mirabelle Sajisevi  1 Kenny Nguyen  2 Peter Callas  2 Andrew J Holcomb  3 Emre Vural  4 Kyle P Davis  5 Carissa M Thomas  6 Karolina A Plonowska-Hirschfeld  7 John S Stein  6 Antoine Eskander  8   9 Kiran Kakarala  10 Danny J Enepekides  8 Michael P Hier  11 William R Ryan  7 American Head and Neck Society Salivary Gland SectionAmeya A Asarkar  12 Ricardo Aulet  13 Rebecca K Bell  14 Michael A Blasco  15 Vanessa B Bowmaster  16 Clayton P Burruss  17 Jeffson Chung  18 Kimberly Chan  19 Brent A Chang  20 Charles S Coffey  21 David M Cognetti  22 Dylan J Cooper  15 Joehassin Cordero  23 John Donovan  24 Yue Jennifer Du  25 Yusuf Dundar  23 Rogerio A Dedivitis  26 Heather A Edwards  27 Boban M Erovic  28 Philip A Feinberg  29 Emily A Garvey  30 David P Goldstein  31 Joseph F Goodman  32 Rafael N Goulart  33 Neerav Goyal  19 Stefan Grasl  34 Jonathan P Giurintano  35 Nikita Gupta  17 Andy M Habib  35 Trevor G Hackman  36 Jared H Hara  37 Christina Henson  38 Michael L Hinni  20 Nadia Hua  39 Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki  39 Aditya Juloori  37 Noah S Kalman  40 Alexandra E Kejner  41 Sobia F Khaja  42 Jamie A Ku  43 Arnaud Lambert  44 Bao K Luu  21 Kelly R Magliocca  45 Luiz R Medina Dos Santos  33 Cara Michael  27 Brett A Miles  15 Giulianno Molina de Melo  46   47 Michael G Moore  48 Gregoire B Morand  44 Kauê Moura  49 Laith Mukdad  50 Hesameddin Noroozi  31 Rusha Patel  51 Joseph A Paydarfar  14 Nader Sadeghi  44 Fabrice N Savaria  52 Nicole C Schmitt  53 Justin Shapiro  54 Timothy B Shaver  32 Sandro J Stoeckli  52 Maie St John  50 William Alvo Stokes  18 Anita Sulibhavi  55 Jason Tasoulas  36 Varun Vendra  55 Daniel B Vinh  48 Celina G Virgen  10 Christian Wooten  50 Neil M Woody  56 Geoffrey D Young  40
Affiliations

Oncologic Safety of Close Margins in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Grade Major Salivary Gland Carcinoma

Mirabelle Sajisevi et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative radiation therapy for close surgical margins in low- to intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas lacks multi-institutional supportive evidence.

Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes for low- and intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas with close and positive margins.

Design, setting, and participants: The American Head and Neck Society Salivary Gland Section conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 at 41 centers. Margins were classified as R0 (negative), R1 (microscopically positive), or R2 (macroscopically positive). R0 margins were subclassified into clear (>1 mm) or close (≤1 mm). Data analysis was performed from June to October 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcomes were risk factors for local recurrence.

Results: A total of 865 patients (median [IQR] age at surgery, 56 [43-66] years; 553 female individuals [64%] and 312 male individuals [36%]) were included. Of these, 801 (93%) had parotid carcinoma and 64 (7%) had submandibular gland carcinoma, and 748 (86%) had low-grade tumors and 117 (14%) had intermediate-grade tumors, with the following surgical margins: R0 in 673 (78%), R1 in 168 (19%), and R2 in 24 (3%). Close margins were found in 395 of 499 patients with R0 margins (79%), for whom margin distances were measured. A total of 305 patients (35%) underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Of all 865 patients, 35 (4%) had local recurrence with a median (IQR) follow-up of 35.3 (13.9-59.1) months. In patients with close margins as the sole risk factor for recurrence, the local recurrence rates were similar between those who underwent postoperative radiation therapy (0 of 46) or observation (4 of 165 [2%]). Patients with clear margins (n = 104) had no recurrences. The local recurrence rate in patients with R1 or R2 margins was better in those irradiated (2 of 128 [2%]) compared to observed (13 of 64 [20%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.24). Multivariable analysis for local recurrence found the following independent factors: age at diagnosis (HR for a 10-year increase in age, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), R1 vs R0 (HR, 5.21; 95% CI, 2.58-10.54), lymphovascular invasion (HR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.43-13.99), and postoperative radiation therapy (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.29). The 3-year local recurrence-free survivals for the study population were 96% vs 97% in the close margin group.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with low- and intermediate-grade major salivary gland carcinoma, postoperative radiation therapy for positive margins was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. In isolation from other risk factors for local recurrence, select patients with close surgical margins (≤1 mm) may safely be considered for observation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Cognetti reported personal fees from Rakuten Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Hinni reported personal fees from Karl Storz (employer licensed a design for a laryngoscope) outside the submitted work. Dr Juloori reported grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Schmitt reported grants from Astex Pharmaceuticals and personal fees from Sensorion and Checkpoint Surgical outside the submitted work. Dr Ryan reported personal fees from Olympus, Rakuten Medical, and Intuitive outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Overall Survival and Disease-Specific Survival Stratified by Margin Status
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Curve for Local Control Stratified by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients With Negative Margins and Positive Margins
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Local Recurrence-Free Survival in Close Margin Group Stratified by Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Comment in

References

    1. El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, eds. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. Vol 9. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017.
    1. Geiger JL, Ismaila N, Beadle B, et al. . Management of salivary gland malignancy: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(17):1909-1941. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.00449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg. 1986;8(3):177-184. doi:10.1002/hed.2890080309 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park G, Lee SW. Postoperative radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: long-term results of a single-institution experience. Radiat Oncol J. 2018;36(4):317-324. doi:10.3857/roj.2018.00409 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lima RA, Tavares MR, Dias FL, et al. . Clinical prognostic factors in malignant parotid gland tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133(5):702-708. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.001 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types