Identifying technology clusters based on automated patent landscaping
- PMID: 38096139
- PMCID: PMC10721033
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295587
Identifying technology clusters based on automated patent landscaping
Abstract
We introduce a new general methodological approach for accurately and consistently retrieving a large set of patents related to specific technologies. We build upon the automated patent landscaping algorithm by incorporating a tractable amount of human supervision to improve the accuracy and consistency of our results. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by applying it to six novel and representative technologies: additive manufacturing, blockchain, computer vision, genome editing, hydrogen storage, and self-driving vehicles.
Copyright: © 2023 Antonin, Cyril. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Romer PM. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy. 1990;98(5, Part 2):S71–S102. doi: 10.1086/261725 - DOI
-
- Aghion P, Howitt P. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica. 1992;60(2):323–351. doi: 10.2307/2951599 - DOI
-
- Zilibotti F. Growing and slowing down like China. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2017;15(5):943–988. doi: 10.1093/jeea/jvx018 - DOI
-
- Krueger AB, Lindahl M. Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of economic literature. 2001;39(4):1101–1136. doi: 10.1257/jel.39.4.1101 - DOI
-
- Diallo B, Koch W. Bank concentration and Schumpeterian growth: theory and international evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2018;100(3):489–501. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00679 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
