Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 15:25:e51003.
doi: 10.2196/51003.

Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review

Jawad Chishtie  1   2 , Natalie Sapiro  1 , Natalie Wiebe  1   2 , Leora Rabatach  3 , Diane Lorenzetti  4   5 , Alexander A Leung  4   6 , Doreen Rabi  4   6 , Hude Quan  1   4 , Cathy A Eastwood  1   4
Affiliations

Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review

Jawad Chishtie et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) enable health data exchange across interconnected systems from varied settings. Epic is among the 5 leading EHR providers and is the most adopted EHR system across the globe. Despite its global reach, there is a gap in the literature detailing how EHR systems such as Epic have been used for health care research.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the available literature on use cases of the Epic EHR for research in various areas of clinical and health sciences.

Methods: We used established scoping review methods and searched 9 major information repositories, including databases and gray literature sources. To categorize the research data, we developed detailed criteria for 5 major research domains to present the results.

Results: We present a comprehensive picture of the method types in 5 research domains. A total of 4669 articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers at each stage, while 206 articles were abstracted. Most studies were from the United States, with a sharp increase in volume from the year 2015 onwards. Most articles focused on clinical care, health services research and clinical decision support. Among research designs, most studies used longitudinal designs, followed by interventional studies implemented at single sites in adult populations. Important facilitators and barriers to the use of Epic and EHRs in general were identified. Important lessons to the use of Epic and other EHRs for research purposes were also synthesized.

Conclusions: The Epic EHR provides a wide variety of functions that are helpful toward research in several domains, including clinical and population health, quality improvement, and the development of clinical decision support tools. As Epic is reported to be the most globally adopted EHR, researchers can take advantage of its various system features, including pooled data, integration of modules and developing decision support tools. Such research opportunities afforded by the system can contribute to improving quality of care, building health system efficiencies, and conducting population-level studies. Although this review is limited to the Epic EHR system, the larger lessons are generalizable to other EHRs.

Keywords: EHR; EMR; Epic; electronic health record; electronic medical record; health care; health system; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart. EMR: electronic medical record.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Literature type by year.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Research literature by US state.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Flatow VH, Ibragimova N, Divino CM, Eshak DS, Twohig BC, Bassily-Marcus AM, Kohli-Seth R. Quality outcomes in the surgical intensive care unit after electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6(4):611–8. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-04-RA-0044. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26767058 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anshari M. Redefining electronic health records (EHR) and electronic medical records (EMR) to promote patient empowerment. Int J Inform Dev. 2019;8(1):35–9. doi: 10.14421/ijid.2019.08106. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/ijid/article/view/08106/1540 - DOI
    1. Garets D, Davis M. Electronic medical records vs. electronic health records: yes, there is a difference. A HIMSS Analytics White Paper. DocPlayer. 2006. [2023-11-19]. http://tinyurl.com/53pysj7k .
    1. Staggers N, Thompson CB, Snyder-Halpern R. History and trends in clinical information systems in the United States. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(1):75–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00075.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Business Wire. 2017. [2023-11-19]. http://tinyurl.com/nw3atbkx .

Publication types