An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis
- PMID: 38101756
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.11.032
An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis
Abstract
Background & aims: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH.
Methods: In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.
Results: Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018).
Conclusions: In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF.
Impact and implications: This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis.
Trial registration number: #NCT02900443.
Keywords: autoimmune hepatitis; azathioprine; biochemical remission; first-line treatment; induction therapy; mycophenolate mofetil; phase IV trial; randomised-controlled trial; remission.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (CAMARO trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2022 Dec 13;23(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06890-w. Trials. 2022. PMID: 36514163 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine use in individuals with autoimmune hepatitis.JHEP Rep. 2022 Sep 30;4(12):100601. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100601. eCollection 2022 Dec. JHEP Rep. 2022. PMID: 36411768 Free PMC article.
-
Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study): a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07832-w. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38233878 Free PMC article.
-
MMF Is an Effective and Safer Treatment Options for Treatment-Naïve Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis Compared to Azathioprine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Dig Dis. 2025 Mar-Apr;26(3-4):113-128. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13348. Epub 2025 May 19. J Dig Dis. 2025. PMID: 40386905 Free PMC article.
-
Mycophenolate mofetil as a rescue therapy for autoimmune hepatitis patients who are not responsive to standard therapy.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;5(4):517-22. doi: 10.1586/egh.11.45. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011. PMID: 21780898 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in the Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis.J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024 Oct 28;12(10):878-885. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00193. Epub 2024 Sep 24. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024. PMID: 39440223 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Managing severe dermatitis and grade 4 pneumonitis in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer following pembrolizumab treatment: A case report.Oncol Lett. 2025 Jun 3;30(2):380. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.15126. eCollection 2025 Aug. Oncol Lett. 2025. PMID: 40503034 Free PMC article.
-
Current and Emerging Treatments for Autoimmune Hepatitis.Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2024 Mar;20(3):176-178. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2024. PMID: 38680174 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil: Which Should Be Used in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis?Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025 Mar;21(3):183-185. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025. PMID: 40115658 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
New Therapeutic Challenges in Pediatric Gastroenterology: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(8):923. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080923. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40281872 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous