Live two-way video versus face-to-face treatment for depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A 24-week randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 38102849
- DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13618
Live two-way video versus face-to-face treatment for depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A 24-week randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Aim: Live two-way video, easily accessible from home via smartphones and other devices, is becoming a new way of providing psychiatric treatment. However, lack of evidence for real-world clinical setting effectiveness hampers its approval by medical insurance in some countries. Here, we conducted the first large-scale pragmatic, randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of long-term treatment for multiple psychiatric disorders via two-way video using smartphones and other devices, which are currently the primary means of telecommunication.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial compared two-way video versus face-to-face treatment for depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the subacute/maintenance phase during a 24-week period. Adult patients with the above-mentioned disorders were allocated to either a two-way video group (≥50% video sessions) or a face-to-face group (100% in-person sessions) and received standard treatment covered by public medical insurance. The primary outcome was the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary (SF-36 MCS) score. Secondary outcomes included all-cause discontinuation, working alliance, adverse events, and the severity rating scales for each disorder.
Results: A total of 199 patients participated in this study. After 24 weeks of treatment, two-way video treatment was found to be noninferior to face-to-face treatment regarding SF-36 MCS score (48.50 vs 46.68, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding most secondary end points, including all-cause discontinuation, treatment efficacy, and satisfaction.
Conclusion: Two-way video treatment using smartphones and other devices, was noninferior to face-to-face treatment in real-world clinical settings. Modern telemedicine, easily accessible from home, can be used as a form of health care.
Keywords: anxiety disorder; depression; long‐term treatment; obsessive‐compulsive disorder; two‐way video.
© 2023 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States. Report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization, Genève, 2010.
-
- World Health Organization. The Impact of COVID‐19 on Mental, Neurological and Substance Use Services: Results of a Rapid Assessment. 2020.
-
- Kinoshita S, Cortright K, Crawford A et al. Changes in telepsychiatry regulations during the COVID‐19 pandemic: 17 countries and regions' approaches to an evolving healthcare landscape. Psychol. Med. 2022; 52: 2606–2613.
-
- Zangani C, Ostinelli EG, Smith KA et al. Impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: Systematic review. JMIR Mental Health 2022; 9: e38600.
-
- Hilty DM, Ferrer DC, Parish MB, Johnston B, Callahan EJ, Yellowlees PM. The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemedicine and e‐Health 2013; 19: 444–454.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical