Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad404.
doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad404.

Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study)

Collaborators, Affiliations

Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study)

Alexander A J Grüter et al. Br J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Substantial variation exists when performing a minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) due to disparities in training, expertise and differences in implementation of innovations. This study aimed to achieve national consensus on an optimal and standardized MIRH technique for colon cancer and to develop and validate a video-based competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIRH.

Method: Statements covering all elements of MIRH were formulated. Subsequently, the Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on a standardized MIRH among 76 colorectal surgeons from 43 different centres. A CAT was developed based on the Delphi results. Nine surgeons assessed the same 12 unedited full-length videos using the CAT, allowing evaluation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus (≥80% agreement) was achieved on 23 of the 24 statements. Consensus statements included the use of low intra-abdominal pressure, detailed anatomical outline how to perform complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation, the creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis, and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision using a wound protector. The CAT included seven consecutive steps to measure competency of the MIRH and showed high consistency among surgeons with an overall ICC of 0.923.

Conclusion: Nationwide consensus on a standardized and optimized technique of MIRH was reached. The CAT developed showed excellent interrater reliability. These achievements are crucial steps to an ongoing nationwide quality improvement project (the Right study).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the Delphi process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Video-based competency assessment tool of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy, step 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatterplot of the average competency assessment tool (CAT) scores per rater and average score of all raters per video with the cutoff value of 2.7

References

    1. Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Faris PD, James MTet al. Challenges and potential solutions to the evaluation, monitoring, and regulation of surgical innovations. BMC Surg 2019;19:119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet 2013;382:1121–1129 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn ARet al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1434–1442 - PubMed
    1. Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D, Brown CSB, Hewett PJ, Abbott Set al. Association of surgical skill assessment with clinical outcomes in cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 2020;155:590–598 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heiden BT, Eaton DB, Chang S-H, Yan Y, Baumann AA, Schoen MWet al. Association between surgical quality metric adherence and overall survival among US veterans with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Surg 2023;158:293–301 - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding