Deciphering conundrums of adeno-associated virus liver-directed gene therapy: focus on hemophilia
- PMID: 38103734
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.12.005
Deciphering conundrums of adeno-associated virus liver-directed gene therapy: focus on hemophilia
Abstract
Adeno-associated virus gene therapy has been the subject of intensive investigation for monogenic disease gene addition therapy for more than 25 years, yet few therapies have been approved by regulatory agencies. Most have not progressed beyond phase 1/2 due to toxicity, lack of efficacy, or both. The liver is a natural target for adeno-associated virus since most serotypes have a high degree of tropism for hepatocytes due to cell surface receptors for the virus and the unique liver sinusoidal geometry facilitating high volumes of blood contact with hepatocyte cell surfaces. Recessive monogenic diseases such as hemophilia represent promising targets since the defective proteins are often synthesized in the liver and secreted into the circulation, making them easy to measure, and many do not require precise regulation. Yet, despite initiation of many disease-specific clinical trials, therapeutic windows are often nonexistent, resulting in excess toxicity and insufficient efficacy. Iterative progress built on these attempts is best illustrated by hemophilia, with the first regulatory approvals for factor IX and factor VIII gene therapies eventually achieved 25 years after the first gene therapy studies in humans. Although successful gene transfer may result in the production of sufficient transgenic protein to modify the disease, many emerging questions on durability, predictability, reliability, and variability of response have not been answered. The underlying biology accounting for these heterogeneous responses and the interplay between host and virus is the subject of intense investigation and the subject of this review.
Keywords: AAV vectors; gene therapy; hemophilia A; hemophilia B; liver.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interests G.F.P. is a consultant to ASC Therapeutics, BioMarin, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Spark Therapeutics and is on the scientific advisory boards of Be Bio, Frontera, and Metagenomi. S.F. and B.R.L. are employees and stockholders of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. R.K. is serving on scientific advisory boards of BioMarin and Pfizer and has received research funding from Bayer.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
