Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 Dec 6:rs.3.rs-3672056.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3672056/v1.

Eribulin induces micronuclei and enhances the nuclear localization of cGAS in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Affiliations

Eribulin induces micronuclei and enhances the nuclear localization of cGAS in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Hideyuki Yamada et al. Res Sq. .

Update in

Abstract

Eribulin (ERI), clinically utilized for locally advanced or metastatic breast tumors, has shown potential links to the immune system. Notably, the cGAS-STING pathway, a key component of innate immunity, has gained prominence. Yet, limited reports explore ERI's effects on the cGAS-STING pathway. Additionally, the nuclear presence of cGAS remains poorly understood. This study uniquely delves into ERI's impact on both the cytosolic cGAS-STING pathway and nuclear cGAS. ERI enhances nuclear localization of cGAS, resulting in hyper-activation of the cGAS-STING pathway in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Reduction of cGAS heightened both cell proliferation and ERI sensitivity. In clinical data using ERI in a neo-adjuvant setting, patients with low cGAS cases exhibited reduced likelihood of achieving pathological complete response after ERI treatment. These findings illuminate the potential of cGAS and IFNβ as predictive biomarkers for ERI sensitivity, providing valuable insights for personalized breast cancer treatment strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K08727 and JP21K08638

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Live cell imaging was used to show the effects of ERI on cell division. (a) MM231 cells and (c) RPE1 cells were treated with DMSO or PTX or ERI. Representative images of the mitotic morphology for the cells are shown. For (b) MM231 cells and (d) RPE1 cells, the length of mitotic duration and the ratio of cells with characteristic mitotic abnormalities are shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effects of ERI on cGAS was evaluated. Immunofluorescence with (a) cGAS or (b) IFNβ was performed with MM231 cells treated with DMSO or PTX-short or PTX-long or ERI-short or ERI-long. Identically, Immunofluorescence with (a) cGAS or (b) IFNβ was performed with RPE1 cells treated with DMSO or PTX-short or PTX-long. DAPI and LAP2 were used for nuclear staining. (e) The number of characteristic cells was counted and statistically compared. The meaning of the asterisks are as follows: * p<0.001, **:p<0.01, *** p<0.05 (f) MM231 cells and RPE1 cells were used and their protein expression of cGAS, STING, pIRF3 and IFNβ was evaluated by western blotting. Vinculin was used as loading control. (g) The cGAS expression of the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions was evaluated by cell fractionation assay. Vinculin was used as cytoplasmic loading control and Histone H3 as nuclear loading control.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effects of KD-cGAS on cell proliferation was evaluated. MM231 cells (DMSO, PTX-short, ERI-short, KD-cGAS-DMSO, KD-cGAS-PTX, KD-cGAS-ERI) were used (a) Proliferation assay was performed. 24 hours after knockdown of cGAS was defined as 0h, and cell proliferation was evaluated every 12 hours. (b) Tripan blue stain was used to evaluate the percentage of live and dead cells 24 hours after treatment. (c) We evaluated the effects of knocking down of cGAS on RAD51 expression. Vinculin was used as loading control. (d) Immunofluorescence with RAD51 and γH2Ax was performed. DAPI was used for nuclear staining. (e) We counted the number of nuclear foci in each cell stained with γH2Ax and RAD51. The meaning of the asterisks are as follows: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Immunostaining was performed with clinical samples. (a) The method of the patients-extraction is shown. (b) In PTX group and (c) In ERI group, representative immunostaining images before and after chemotherapy are stained with cGAS, STING and IFNβ. (d) The H-score of cGAS was plotted for both PCR and non-PCR cases in both ERI and PTX group. (e) Similary, the H-score of IFNβ was plotted.

References

    1. Cortes Javier et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet. 377, 914–923 (2011) - PubMed
    1. Kazutaka N et al. A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Eribulin Versus Paclitaxel in Women with Operable Breast Cancer: The JONIE-3 Study. Clinical Breast Cancer. 22, e881–e891 (2022) - PubMed
    1. Lengauer C K W Kinzler, B Vogelstein. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 396, 643–649 (1998). - PubMed
    1. Scribano Christina M et al. Chromosomal instability sensitizes patient breast tumors to multipolar divisions induced by paclitaxel. Sci Transl Med. 13, eabd4811 (2021) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding Shane M et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature. 548, 466–470 (2017) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types