Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 Dec 7:2023.12.05.23299462.
doi: 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299462.

SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Immune Responses in Convalescent Individuals Over 12 Months Reveal Severity-Dependent Antibody Dynamics

Affiliations

SARS-CoV-2 Humoral Immune Responses in Convalescent Individuals Over 12 Months Reveal Severity-Dependent Antibody Dynamics

Nadia Siles et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Understanding the kinetics and longevity of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to informing strategies toward reducing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reinfections, and improving vaccination and therapy approaches.

Methods: We evaluated antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), spike (S), and receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike in 98 convalescent participants who experienced asymptomatic, mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 disease and in 17 non-vaccinated, non-infected controls, using four different antibody assays. Participants were sampled longitudinally at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-SARS-CoV-2 positive PCR test.

Findings: Increasing acute COVID-19 disease severity correlated with higher anti-N and anti-RBD antibody titers throughout 12 months post-infection. Anti-N and anti-RBD titers declined over time in all participants, with the exception of increased anti-RBD titers post-vaccination, and the decay rates were faster in hospitalized compared to non-hospitalized participants. <50% of participants retained anti-N titers above control levels at 12 months, with non-hospitalized participants falling below control levels sooner. Nearly all hospitalized and non-hospitalized participants maintained anti-RBD titers above controls for up to 12 months, suggesting longevity of protection against severe reinfections. Nonetheless, by 6 months, few participants retained >50% of their 1-month anti-N or anti-RBD titers. Vaccine-induced increases in anti-RBD titers were greater in non-hospitalized relative to hospitalized participants. Early convalescent antibody titers correlated with age, but no association was observed between Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) status or acute steroid treatment and convalescent antibody titers.

Interpretation: Hospitalized participants developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers relative to non-hospitalized participants, a difference that persisted throughout 12 months, despite the faster decline in titers in hospitalized participants. In both groups, while anti-N titers fell below control levels for at least half of the participants, anti-RBD titers remained above control levels for almost all participants over 12 months, demonstrating generation of long-lived antibody responses known to correlate with protection from severe disease across COVID-19 severities. Overall, our findings contribute to the evolving understanding of COVID-19 antibody dynamics.

Funding: Austin Public Health, NIAAA, Babson Diagnostics, Dell Medical School Startup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests Nadia Siles: Recipient of National Consortium for Graduate Degrees for Minorities in Engineering and Science (GEM) Fellowship Maisey Schuler: Nothing to disclose Cole Maguire: Recipient of NIDA T32 Training Grant 5T32DA018926-18 for graduate student stipend and travel support for scientific conferences from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis Dzifa Amengor: Nothing to disclose Annalee Nguyen: Nothing to disclose Rebecca Wilen: Nothing to disclose Jacob Rogers: Nothing to disclose Sam Bazzi: Recipient of NIH NIAAA T32AA007471 and Fred Murphy Jones & Homer Lindsey Bruce Endowed Fellowships for graduate student stipend Blaine Caslin: Nothing to disclose Christopher DiPasquale: Vice President of Assay Development of Babson Diagnostics, Inc.; holder of stock/stock options for Babson; salary as employee of Babson Melissa Abigania: Nothing to disclose Eric Olson: Chairman of the Board of Babson Diagnostics, Inc.; holder of stock/stock options for Babson; salary as employee of Babson Todd Triplett: Nothing to disclose Janelle Creaturo: Nothing to disclose Kerin Hurley: Nothing to disclose Justin F. Rousseau: Recipient of NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding for another project Stephen M. Strakowski: Recipient of NIH National Institute of Mental Health and Jassen funding for other projects and consulting fees for Sunovion, WebMD, and Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute; holds leadership role with American Brain Coalition and National Network Depression Centers Dennis Wylie: Nothing to disclose Jennifer Maynard: Recipient of grant funding from Welch Foundation, Texas Biologics, NIAID, and National Science Foundation; consulting fees from Sidley on behalf of Amgen and Genentech; and travel support for attending PEGS Protein & Antibody Engineering Summit 2023, Gordon conference on Protein Engineering 2023, and MD Anderson & UT Austin Collaborative Research Summit 2023; license holder for HexaPro (multiple non-exclusive licenses) and 3A3 antibody, specific for prefusion spike; and member of scientific advisory boards of Janux (2019 – present) and Releviate (2020-present) Lauren I. R. Ehrlich: Nothing to disclose Esther Melamed: Recipient of research funding from Babson Diagnostics; consulting fees from Horizon, Roche, Summus; honoraria from the National Center for Health Research and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; and travel support for scientific conferences from the NIH, National Center for Health Research, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Recruitment and Experimental Design.
A) Sample size of acute COVID-19 participants in the cohort by disease severity, B) Participant serum was collected at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-positive PCR, C) ELISA schematic of detection of N and RBD antibodies in participant serum, D) Reported COVID-19 cases in the recruitment county (Travis County) over the time of recruitment, and E) Distribution of symptom onset or PCR+ for asymptomatic individuals in the cohort by acute COVID-19 severity. (Short tick marks = individual participants’ symptom onset or PCR+; Long tick marks = interquartile range within each disease severity group.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers correlate with COVID-19 disease severity.
Box and whisker plots of A) Anti-N, B) Anti-S, and C) Anti-RBD IgG titers for asymptomatic (A), mild (M), severe (S), and critical (Crt) groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR. (Global p value obtained with cumulative link model testing between disease severity and antibody titers, controlling for age and sex. Pairwise comparisons performed using Wilcox test, with FDR correction. * p.adj ≤ 0·05, ** p.adj ≤ 0·01, *** p.adj ≤ 0·001. Dotted lines indicate 95% quantile of healthy controls.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination increases anti-RBD titers to a greater extent in participants who experienced milder disease but reduces anti-RBD:anti-S titers.
Log2 fold change of A) Anti-N and B) Anti-RBD IgG titers relative to participants’ 1-month titers. C) Anti-RBD to anti-S ratio at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-positive SARS-CoV2 PCR, separating samples based on whether they occurred before and after 1st vaccination, and D) Anti-RBD to anti-S IgG ratio before and after 1st vaccination for all samples. Pairwise comparisons performed using Wilcox test, with FDR correction. * p.adj ≤ 0·05, ** p.adj ≤ 0·01, *** p.adj ≤ 0·001. (Dashed lines indicate 1-month titer levels)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Anti-N titers decline below, while anti-RBD titers are sustained above control levels over 12 months, and anti-N IgG titers decay faster in hospitalized individuals.
Longitudinal decay of A) anti-N and B) anti-RBD antibody titers in participants stratified by initial disease severity. Participant timepoints are connected by light gray lines. Control 95% confidence interval represented by dashed line. Percentage of participants whose C) anti-N titers and D) anti-RBD titers remained above 50% of their respective 1-month post-infection titers over 12 months. Percentage of participants whose E) anti-N and F) anti-RBD antibody titers remained above the 95th quantile of controls over 12 months in all participants. Dashed lines in C-F represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Age correlates with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in convalescent participants.
Correlation between age and A) anti-N and B) anti-RBD IgG, and between sex and C) anti-N and D) anti-RBD IgG while controlling for disease severity (F = female, M = male).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Steroid treatment did not correlate with SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in hospitalized participants.
A) anti-N and B) anti-RBD IgG titers in hospitalized participants across 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, stratified by treatment with steroids (Wilcox test, p>0·05 for all pairwise comparisons of titers in participants treated with or without steroids).

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. WHO Health Emergency Dashboard. 2023. [cited 2023 Jan 3]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
    1. CDC. COVID Data Tracker: COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. [cited 2023 Jun 27]. Available from: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-states-jurisdictions
    1. Focosi D, McConnell S, Casadevall A, Cappello E, Valdiserra G, Tuccori M. Monoclonal antibody therapies against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. Nov;22(11):e311–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chowdhury MA, Hossain N, Kashem MA, Shahid MdA, Alam A. Immune response in COVID-19: A review. J Infect Public Health. 2020. Nov;13(11):1619–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Elslande J, Decru B, Jonckheere S, Van Wijngaerden E, Houben E, Vandecandelaere P, et al. Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. Nov;26(11):1557.e1–1557.e7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types