Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements
- PMID: 38106985
- PMCID: PMC10725648
- DOI: 10.2147/RRU.S372803
Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements
Abstract
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the gold standard for localized prostate cancer. Several RARP approaches were developed and described over the years, aimed at improving oncological and functional outcomes. In 2010, Galfano et al described a new RARP technique, known as Retzius-sparing RARP (RS-RARP), a posterior approach through the Douglas space that spares the anterior support structures involved with urinary continence and sexual potency. This approach has been used increasingly in many centers around the world comparing its results with those of the most used standard anterior approach. Several randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrated an important advantage relative to standard anterior RARP in terms of early urinary continence recovery, with comparable perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. Several surgeons are concerned regarding RS-RARP because it appears to increase the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). However, this statement is based on low-certainty evidence. Indeed, the available studies compared the results of surgeons who had an initial experience with posterior RARP with those who had a solid experience with anterior RARP. Recent evidence strongly suggests that RS-RARP is feasible and safe not only in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patient but also in challenging scenario such as high-risk setting, salvage prostatectomy and after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Keywords: Retzius-sparing; high-risk prostate cancer; positive surgical margins; radical prostatectomy; urinary continence.
© 2023 Ferretti et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 32536488
-
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28483330 Clinical Trial.
-
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32813279 Free PMC article.
-
Can salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improve continence outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.World J Urol. 2023 Sep;41(9):2311-2317. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04505-w. Epub 2023 Jul 7. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37414943
-
Retzius-Sparing vs Modified Anatomical Structure Preserving and Retzius-Repairing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison on Functional Outcomes with a 1-Year Follow-Up.J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1214-1222. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0073. Epub 2022 Jun 2. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35546454 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Oncology: Current Insights and Challenges.Res Rep Urol. 2025 Aug 21;17:293-308. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S526184. eCollection 2025. Res Rep Urol. 2025. PMID: 40860646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-Dimensional Virtual Model for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN): Development of Study Protocol for Evaluation of the Learning Curve to Optimize the Precision and Accuracy of the 3D Imaging.Res Rep Urol. 2025 Feb 6;17:27-30. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S503524. eCollection 2025. Res Rep Urol. 2025. PMID: 39931350 Free PMC article.
-
[Surgical techniques to improve continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on video-anatomy-a review].Urologie. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02627-0. Online ahead of print. Urologie. 2025. PMID: 40522376 Review. German.
-
Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single-surgeon series.BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 23;6(7):e70058. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70058. eCollection 2025 Jul. BJUI Compass. 2025. PMID: 40708758 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of efficacy of Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2025 May 14;15:1547687. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547687. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40444077 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martini A, Falagario UG, Villers A, et al. Contemporary techniques of prostate dissection for robot-assisted prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2020;78:583–591. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources