The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center
- PMID: 38110537
- DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01363-2
The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center
Abstract
Despite the establishment of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) worldwide, no study has evaluated their impact on the Portuguese population. Our work has shown that the implementation of an FLS is associated with a significant increase in OP treatment and a lower risk of secondary fracture.
Purpose: Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been established worldwide, with positive effects on treatment, secondary fracture, mortality, and economic burden. However, no study has evaluated their impact on the Portuguese population. Therefore, we purposed to evaluate the effect of an FLS model in a Portuguese center on osteoporosis (OP) treatment, secondary fracture, and mortality rates, 3 years after a fragility fracture.
Methods: Patients over 50 years old, admitted with a fragility fracture, between January 2017 and December 2020, were included in this retrospective study. Patients evaluated after FLS implementation (2019-2020) were compared with those evaluated before (2017-2018) and followed for 36 months. Predictors of secondary fracture and mortality were assessed using a multivariate Cox regression model, adjusted to potential confounders.
Results: A total of 551 patients were included (346 before and 205 after FLS). The FLS significantly increased the rate of OP treatment, when compared with standard clinical practice (8.1% vs 77.6%). During follow-up, the secondary fracture rate was 14.7% and 7.3%, before and after FLS, respectively. FLS was associated with a lower risk of secondary fracture (HR 0.39, C.I. 0.16-0.92). Although we observed a lower mortality rate (25.1% vs 13.7%), FLS was not a significant predictor of survival.
Conclusion: Implementing the FLS model in a Portuguese center has increased OP treatment and reduced the risk of secondary fracture. We believe that our work supports adopting FLS models in national programs.
Keywords: Fracture Liaison Service; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Secondary prevention.
© 2023. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.
Similar articles
-
A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study.Osteoporos Int. 2022 Aug;33(8):1695-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06298-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Osteoporos Int. 2022. PMID: 35357521 Free PMC article.
-
Secondary osteoporosis prevention: three-year outcomes from a Fracture Liaison Service in elderly hip fracture patients.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 May 5;36(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02761-3. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024. PMID: 38704788 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1759-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29704027
-
Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29285627
-
Fracture liaison: A crucial tool in the fight against fragility fracture.Maturitas. 2022 Nov;165:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Maturitas. 2022. PMID: 35863271 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of in-hospital initiation of a surgeon-led, anti-osteoporotic medication algorithm for patients with fragility hip fractures: a quasi-experimental study.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 30;145(1):358. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05974-x. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40588596
References
-
- Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F et al (2016) Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: risk factor updates and societal impact. World J Orthop 7(3):171–181. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.171 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Branco JC, Rodrigues AM, Gouveia N et al (2016) Prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and their impact on health-related quality of life, physical function and mental health in Portugal: results from EpiReumaPt- a national health survey. RMD Open 2(1):e000166. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000166 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC et al (2021) SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 16(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Barcelos A, Gonçalves J, Mateus C, Canhão H, Rodrigues AM (2023) Costs of incident non-hip osteoporosis-related fractures in postmenopausal women from a payer perspective. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06881-w - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Barcelos A, Gonçalves J, Mateus C, Canhão H, Rodrigues AM (2023) Costs of hip fractures in postmenopausal women in Portugal: a study from the payer’s perspective. Acta Med Port 36(12):848–849. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20481 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous