Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 18;19(1):4.
doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01363-2.

The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center

Affiliations

The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center

Susana P Silva et al. Arch Osteoporos. .

Abstract

Despite the establishment of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) worldwide, no study has evaluated their impact on the Portuguese population. Our work has shown that the implementation of an FLS is associated with a significant increase in OP treatment and a lower risk of secondary fracture.

Purpose: Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been established worldwide, with positive effects on treatment, secondary fracture, mortality, and economic burden. However, no study has evaluated their impact on the Portuguese population. Therefore, we purposed to evaluate the effect of an FLS model in a Portuguese center on osteoporosis (OP) treatment, secondary fracture, and mortality rates, 3 years after a fragility fracture.

Methods: Patients over 50 years old, admitted with a fragility fracture, between January 2017 and December 2020, were included in this retrospective study. Patients evaluated after FLS implementation (2019-2020) were compared with those evaluated before (2017-2018) and followed for 36 months. Predictors of secondary fracture and mortality were assessed using a multivariate Cox regression model, adjusted to potential confounders.

Results: A total of 551 patients were included (346 before and 205 after FLS). The FLS significantly increased the rate of OP treatment, when compared with standard clinical practice (8.1% vs 77.6%). During follow-up, the secondary fracture rate was 14.7% and 7.3%, before and after FLS, respectively. FLS was associated with a lower risk of secondary fracture (HR 0.39, C.I. 0.16-0.92). Although we observed a lower mortality rate (25.1% vs 13.7%), FLS was not a significant predictor of survival.

Conclusion: Implementing the FLS model in a Portuguese center has increased OP treatment and reduced the risk of secondary fracture. We believe that our work supports adopting FLS models in national programs.

Keywords: Fracture Liaison Service; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Secondary prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F et al (2016) Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: risk factor updates and societal impact. World J Orthop 7(3):171–181. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.171 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Branco JC, Rodrigues AM, Gouveia N et al (2016) Prevalence of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and their impact on health-related quality of life, physical function and mental health in Portugal: results from EpiReumaPt- a national health survey. RMD Open 2(1):e000166. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000166 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC et al (2021) SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 16(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Barcelos A, Gonçalves J, Mateus C, Canhão H, Rodrigues AM (2023) Costs of incident non-hip osteoporosis-related fractures in postmenopausal women from a payer perspective. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06881-w - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Barcelos A, Gonçalves J, Mateus C, Canhão H, Rodrigues AM (2023) Costs of hip fractures in postmenopausal women in Portugal: a study from the payer’s perspective. Acta Med Port 36(12):848–849. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20481 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources