Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology
- PMID: 38110672
- DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00921-5
Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology
Abstract
Infertility affects one in six couples, with in vitro fertilization (IVF) offering many the chance of conception. Compared to the solitary oocyte produced during the natural menstrual cycle, the supraphysiological ovarian stimulation needed to produce multiple oocytes during IVF results in a dysfunctional luteal phase that can be insufficient to support implantation and maintain pregnancy. Consequently, hormonal supplementation with luteal phase support, principally exogenous progesterone, is used to optimize pregnancy rates; however, luteal phase support remains largely 'black-box' with insufficient clarity regarding the optimal timing, dosing, route and duration of treatment. Herein, we review the evidence on luteal phase support and highlight remaining uncertainties and future research directions. Specifically, we outline the physiological luteal phase, which is regulated by progesterone from the corpus luteum, and evaluate how it is altered by the supraphysiological ovarian stimulation used during IVF. Additionally, we describe the effects of the hormonal triggers used to mature oocytes on the degree of luteal phase support required. We explain the histological transformation of the endometrium during the luteal phase and evaluate markers of endometrial receptivity that attempt to identify the 'window of implantation'. We also cover progesterone receptor signalling, circulating progesterone levels associated with implantation, and the pharmacokinetics of available progesterone formulations to inform the design of luteal phase support regimens.
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Similar articles
-
Luteal granulosa cells from natural cycles are more capable of maintaining their viability, steroidogenic activity and LH receptor expression than those of stimulated IVF cycles.Hum Reprod. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):345-355. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey353. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30520979
-
Daily low-dose hCG stimulation during the luteal phase combined with GnRHa triggered IVF cycles without exogenous progesterone: a proof of concept trial.Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2387-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev184. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26209535 Clinical Trial.
-
The early luteal hormonal profile in IVF patients triggered with hCG.Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):157-166. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez235. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 31967304
-
Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;17(3):277-81. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169105.62257.e3. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15870562 Review.
-
Ovarian stimulation for IVF and endometrial receptivity--the missing link.Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5 Suppl 1:36-43. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(11)60215-0. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002. PMID: 12537780 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of oral allylestrenol in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A retrospective clinical trial.Glob Health Med. 2024 Dec 31;6(6):427-432. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2024.01056. Glob Health Med. 2024. PMID: 39741987 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Dose GnRH Agonist on the Day of Frozen Embryo Transfer in Artificial Cycles: Preliminary Evidence from Randomized Trials.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):5763. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165763. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The relationship between serum estradiol and progesterone levels one day before frozen embryo transfer and pregnancy rates in artificially prepared frozen embryo cycles: are there any threshold serum hormone levels to predict pregnancy in luteal support by the vaginal and subcutaneous route combined?J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Sep 3;26(3):157-166. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-1-13. Epub 2025 Aug 13. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40801263 Free PMC article.
-
A Progesterone Microneedle Patch for Self-Administration in the Prevention of Preterm Birth in a Mouse Model.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Apr 1;19:2473-2490. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S502701. eCollection 2025. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025. PMID: 40190812 Free PMC article.
-
The prospect of artificial intelligence to personalize assisted reproductive technology.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 1;7(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01006-x. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38429464 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978920068315 (2023).
-
- Munne, S. et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil. Steril. 112, 1071–1079.e7 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Saadat, P. et al. Accelerated endometrial maturation in the luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists versus antagonists. Fertil. Steril. 82, 167–171 (2004). - PubMed
-
- The ESHRE Guideline Group on Ovarian Stimulation et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 2020, hoaa009 (2020).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials