Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Oct;113(10):1393-1404.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02353-7. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Performance of wearable watch-type home blood pressure measurement devices in a real-world clinical sample

Mattia Lunardi  1   2   3 , Farooq Muhammad  2 , Atif Shahzad  2 , Asma Nadeem  2 , Lisa Combe  2 , Andrew J Simpkin  4   5 , Faisal Sharif  1 , William Wijns  2 , John W McEvoy  6
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of wearable watch-type home blood pressure measurement devices in a real-world clinical sample

Mattia Lunardi et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Independent testing of home blood pressure (BP) measurement (HBPM) devices is often lacking, particularly among older and multi-morbid patients.

Methods: We studied the Bpro G2 (using tonometry), Omron HeartGuide (using occlusive oscillometric technology), and Heartisans (using photoplethysmography) wrist watch HBPM devices against a gold standard brachial sphygmomanometer. To test device performance, we used the ISO81060-2 protocol (though this protocol cannot formally validate cuffless devices). We also used linear mixed models to compare adjusted longitudinal BP measurements between devices. Finally, as a surrogate for usability, we recorded instances of device failure where no BP measurement was returned.

Results: We enrolled 128 participants (median [Q1-Q3] age 53 [40-65] years, 51% male, 46% on antihypertensive drugs), of whom 100 were suitable for the primary analysis. All three devices had mean BP values within 5 mmHg of sphygmomanometry. However, due to insufficient reliability (e.g., wider than accepted standard deviations of mean BP), none of the three devices passed all criteria required by the ISO81060-2 protocol. In adjusted longitudinal analyses, the Omron device also systematically underestimated systolic and diastolic BP (- 8.46 mmHg; 95% CI 6.07, 10.86; p < 0.001; and - 2.53 mmHg; 95% CI - 4.03, - 1.03; p = 0.001; respectively). Nevertheless, compared to the Omron device, BPro and Heartisans devices had increased odds of failure (BPro: odds ratio [OR] 5.24; p < 0.0001; Heartisans: OR 5.61; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: While we could not formally validate the cuffless devices, our results show that wearable technologies will require improvements to offer reliable BP assessment. This study also highlights the need for validation protocols specifically designed for cuffless BP measurement technologies.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Hypertension; Monitoring; Wearable blood pressure watches.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M et al (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 39(33):3021–3104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L et al (2017) Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA 317(2):165–182 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Creegan D, McEvoy JW (2023) Selected highlights in the updated treatment of hypertension. Trends Cardiovasc Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2023.11.001
    1. (NCD-RisC) NRFC (2021) Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 398(10304):957–980 - DOI
    1. Sega R, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Cesana G, Corrao G, Grassi G et al (2005) Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. Circulation 111(14):1777–1783 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources