Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;31(4):5254-5274.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31478-5. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Unraveling interactions and priorities under sustainable development goals in less-developed mountainous areas: case study on the National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, China

Affiliations

Unraveling interactions and priorities under sustainable development goals in less-developed mountainous areas: case study on the National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, China

Qingping Cheng et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Understanding the intricate relationships between progress and the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is vital for informed and adaptable sustainable development policy formulation. This study focused on the Lincang National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (LC-NIDZASD) in China. By evaluating sustainability scores at the county level from 2011 to 2020, the trade-offs and synergies among SDGs were explored. Priority SDGs for development were identified, and targeted recommendations were established based on these findings. The key findings are as follows: (1) The SDG index scores of Lincang and its counties showed an increase from 2011 to 2020, with scores riding from 42.1 to 52.2. SDG6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG12 (Responsible Production and Consumption) had the highest scores, while SDG1 (No Poverty) and SDG4 (Quality Education) increased significantly. However, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in the scores of SDG1, SDG8 (Decent Jobs and Economic Growth), and SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals) in 2020 decreased compared to 2019. Decreased scores in SDG13 (Climate Action) and SDG15 (Life on Land) may be attributable to climate change. (2) The relationship between "Objectives" and ''Governance" appears to be synergistic, while ''Essential Needs" mainly shows a trade-off relationship with ''Objectives" and ''Governance." (3) To promote achievements in the construction of LC-NIDZASD, priority should be given to SDG3 (Health and Well-Being), SDG8, SDG9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), and SDG12; SDG4 should not be ignored. (4) Overall, Lincang has made significant progress in sustainable development. However, to further consolidate these achievements, adjustments should be made for SDG7 (Energy Consumption and Production Structure). Efforts should be made to strengthen climate governance measures and improve warning and forecasting capabilities to promote the synergistic development of SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG13 with other SDGs. This study's dynamic monitoring of changes in the SDGs in Lincang provides valuable insights into the synergies and trade-offs among these goals. Appropriate prioritization across various SDGs can allow for timely adjustments in sustainable management policies, ultimately contributing to the successful operation of the LC-NIDZASD.

Keywords: Less-developed mountainous areas; Pathways; Sustainable Development Goals; Synergies and trade-offs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abdi H, Williams LJ, Valentin D (2013) Multiple factor analysis: principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock data sets. WIREs Comput Stat 5:149–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1246 - DOI
    1. Allen C, Metternicht G, Wiedmann T (2019) Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustain Sci 14:421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8 - DOI
    1. Allen C, Reid M, Thwaites J et al (2020) Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia. Sustain Sci 15:521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x - DOI
    1. Anderson CC, Denich M, Warchold A et al (2022) A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustain Sci 17:1459–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01040-8 - DOI
    1. Asadikia A, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M (2021) Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: machine learning approach. World Dev 140:105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105269 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources