Unraveling interactions and priorities under sustainable development goals in less-developed mountainous areas: case study on the National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, China
- PMID: 38112871
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-31478-5
Unraveling interactions and priorities under sustainable development goals in less-developed mountainous areas: case study on the National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, China
Abstract
Understanding the intricate relationships between progress and the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is vital for informed and adaptable sustainable development policy formulation. This study focused on the Lincang National Innovation Demonstration Zone for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (LC-NIDZASD) in China. By evaluating sustainability scores at the county level from 2011 to 2020, the trade-offs and synergies among SDGs were explored. Priority SDGs for development were identified, and targeted recommendations were established based on these findings. The key findings are as follows: (1) The SDG index scores of Lincang and its counties showed an increase from 2011 to 2020, with scores riding from 42.1 to 52.2. SDG6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG12 (Responsible Production and Consumption) had the highest scores, while SDG1 (No Poverty) and SDG4 (Quality Education) increased significantly. However, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in the scores of SDG1, SDG8 (Decent Jobs and Economic Growth), and SDG17 (Partnerships for the Goals) in 2020 decreased compared to 2019. Decreased scores in SDG13 (Climate Action) and SDG15 (Life on Land) may be attributable to climate change. (2) The relationship between "Objectives" and ''Governance" appears to be synergistic, while ''Essential Needs" mainly shows a trade-off relationship with ''Objectives" and ''Governance." (3) To promote achievements in the construction of LC-NIDZASD, priority should be given to SDG3 (Health and Well-Being), SDG8, SDG9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), and SDG12; SDG4 should not be ignored. (4) Overall, Lincang has made significant progress in sustainable development. However, to further consolidate these achievements, adjustments should be made for SDG7 (Energy Consumption and Production Structure). Efforts should be made to strengthen climate governance measures and improve warning and forecasting capabilities to promote the synergistic development of SDG7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG13 with other SDGs. This study's dynamic monitoring of changes in the SDGs in Lincang provides valuable insights into the synergies and trade-offs among these goals. Appropriate prioritization across various SDGs can allow for timely adjustments in sustainable management policies, ultimately contributing to the successful operation of the LC-NIDZASD.
Keywords: Less-developed mountainous areas; Pathways; Sustainable Development Goals; Synergies and trade-offs.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Interactions among sustainable development goals unveil regional priorities in the Loess Plateau of China.J Environ Manage. 2025 Jul;387:125815. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125815. Epub 2025 May 21. J Environ Manage. 2025. PMID: 40403667
-
The cross-cutting contribution of the end of neglected tropical diseases to the sustainable development goals.Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Apr 4;6(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0288-0. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017. PMID: 28372566 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Untangling the interactions among the Sustainable Development Goals in China.Sci Bull (Beijing). 2022 May 15;67(9):977-984. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 12. Sci Bull (Beijing). 2022. PMID: 36546033
-
A systematic study of interactions between sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Hainan Island.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77984-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39496804 Free PMC article.
-
Empowering distribution system operators: A review of distributed energy resource forecasting techniques.Heliyon. 2024 Jul 22;10(15):e34800. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34800. eCollection 2024 Aug 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39157304 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abdi H, Williams LJ, Valentin D (2013) Multiple factor analysis: principal component analysis for multitable and multiblock data sets. WIREs Comput Stat 5:149–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1246 - DOI
-
- Allen C, Metternicht G, Wiedmann T (2019) Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustain Sci 14:421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8 - DOI
-
- Allen C, Reid M, Thwaites J et al (2020) Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): experience from Australia. Sustain Sci 15:521–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00711-x - DOI
-
- Anderson CC, Denich M, Warchold A et al (2022) A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustain Sci 17:1459–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01040-8 - DOI
-
- Asadikia A, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M (2021) Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: machine learning approach. World Dev 140:105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105269 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources