Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Apr;204(2):237-248.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07165-x. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY

Judith Balmaña et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The interim analysis of the phase IIIb LUCY trial demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of olaparib in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.11 months, which was similar to that in the olaparib arm of the phase III OlympiAD trial (7.03 months). This prespecified analysis provides final overall survival (OS) and safety data.

Methods: The open-label, single-arm LUCY trial of olaparib (300 mg, twice daily) enrolled adults with gBRCAm or somatic BRCA-mutated (sBRCAm), HER2-negative mBC. Patients had previously received a taxane or anthracycline for neoadjuvant/adjuvant or metastatic disease and up to two lines of chemotherapy for mBC.

Results: Of 563 patients screened, 256 (gBRCAm, n = 253; sBRCAm, n = 3) were enrolled. In the gBRCAm cohort, median investigator-assessed PFS (primary endpoint) was 8.18 months and median OS was 24.94 months. Olaparib was clinically effective in all prespecified subgroups: hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapy for mBC, previous platinum-based chemotherapy (including by line of therapy), and previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor use. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (55.3%) and anemia (39.2%). Few patients (6.3%) discontinued olaparib owing to a TEAE. No deaths associated with AEs occurred during the study treatment or 30-day follow-up.

Conclusion: The LUCY patient population reflects a real-world population in line with the licensed indication of olaparib in mBC. These findings support the clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC.

Clinical trial registration: Clinical trials registration number: NCT03286842.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Breast cancer 1 gene product; Breast cancer 2 gene product; Kaplan–Meier survival curves; Olaparib; Overall survival; Progression-free survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors have received compensation for serving as a consultant, invited speaker, or medical writer, or they or the institutions they work for have received research support from the companies or organizations indicated: J Balmaña (AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, and Pfizer); PA Fasching (Agendia, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Hexal, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Seagen); FJ Couch (Ambry Genetics, AstraZeneca, GRAIL, Qiagen, and US Oncology); S Delaloge (AstraZeneca, Besins Healthcare, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, GE, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Puma Biotechnology, Rappta Therapeutics, Roche Genentech, Sanofi, Seagen, Servier, and Taiho Pharma); I Labidi-Galy (AstraZeneca and PharmaMar); J O’Shaughnessy (AbbVie, Agendia, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Genentech, Genomic Health, GRAIL, HERON, Immunomedics, Ipsen, Jounce Therapeutics, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Myriad Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Odonate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Syndax); YH Park (AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche); B You (AstraZeneca); H Bourgeois (Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, and Novartis); A Goncalves (AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Seagen); Z Kemp (AstraZeneca and Lilly); JH Sohn (AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi); S Aksoy (AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche); CV Timcheva (AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, i3 Research, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Parexel, and Roche); T-W Park-Simon (AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen); A Antón-Torres (AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daichi Sankyo, Gilead, Roche, and Seagen); KA Gelmon (AstraZeneca, Ayala, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen). E John, K Baria, and I Gibson are employees and/or stockholders of AstraZeneca. T Jankowski, G Mukhametshina, E Poddubskaya, AF Eisen, and A Swampillai have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates for a PFS and b OS in the gBRCAm cohort (N = 252). Vertical gray dashed lines and corresponding percentages represent the estimated event rates at 12, 24, and 30 months after starting olaparib treatment.  BRCA BRCA1 and/or BRCA2; CI confidence interval; gBRCAm germline BRCA-mutated; OS overall survival; PFS progression-free survival.  aReasons for censoring (n = 45; 17.9%): progression-free at time of analysis (n = 34; 13.5%), lost to follow-up (n = 1; 0.4%), withdrawn consent (n = 7; 2.8%), terminated study for other reason (n = 3; 1.2%).  bReasons for censoring (n = 112; 44.4%): still in survival follow-up (n = 79; 31.3%), terminated study before death (n = 33; 13.1% [lost to follow-up (n = 2; 0.8%), withdrawn consent (n = 28; 11.1%), other reasons (n = 3; 1.2%)])
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier estimates for a, b PFS and c, d OS in the gBRCAm cohort by HR status and by previous CT for mBC.  BRCA BRCA1 and/or BRCA2; CI confidence interval; CT chemotherapy; gBRCAm germline BRCA-mutated; HR hormone receptor; mBC metastatic breast cancer; OS overall survival; PFS progression-free survival; TNBC triple-negative breast cancer.  aYes: received one or two previous lines of CT for metastatic disease (may have also received CT in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting).  bNo: no previous CT for advanced/metastatic disease but received in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Most frequent TEAEs (occurring in > 10% patients) (full analysis set, N = 255). Data are reported as number of patients (%) with: grade < 3 TEAEs (black bars), grade ≥ 3 TEAEs (grey bars) and any-grade TEAEs (right-hand side of graph). TEAEs were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and coded to preferred terms using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 24.0. TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event

References

    1. Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J, Gonzalez-Neira A, Luccarini C, et al. Breast cancer risk genes—association analysis in more than 113,000 women. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):428–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral Breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aleskandarany M, Caracappa D, Nolan CC, Macmillan RD, Ellis IO, Rakha EA, et al. DNA damage response markers are differentially expressed in BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150(1):81–90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3306-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins JM, Nordstrom BL, McLaurin KK, Dalvi TB, McCutcheon SC, Bennett JC, et al. A real-world evidence study of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment patterns and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer by germline BRCA mutation status. Oncol Ther. 2021;9(2):575–589. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00162-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Shaughnessy J, Brezden-Masley C, Cazzaniga M, Dalvi T, Walker G, Bennett J, et al. Prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: global results from the real-world, observational BREAKOUT study. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01349-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Associated data