Interpretation of in vitro concentration-response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting
- PMID: 38115239
- DOI: 10.1002/em.22582
Interpretation of in vitro concentration-response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting
Abstract
Quantitative risk assessments of chemicals are routinely performed using in vivo data from rodents; however, there is growing recognition that non-animal approaches can be human-relevant alternatives. There is an urgent need to build confidence in non-animal alternatives given the international support to reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing where possible. In order for scientists and risk assessors to prepare for this paradigm shift in toxicity assessment, standardization and consensus on in vitro testing strategies and data interpretation will need to be established. To address this issue, an Expert Working Group (EWG) of the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) evaluated the utility of quantitative in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data for risk assessment. The EWG first evaluated available in vitro methodologies and then examined the variability and maximal response of in vitro tests to estimate biologically relevant values for the critical effect sizes considered adverse or unacceptable. Next, the EWG reviewed the approaches and computational models employed to provide human-relevant dose context to in vitro data. Lastly, the EWG evaluated risk assessment applications for which in vitro data are ready for use and applications where further work is required. The EWG concluded that in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data can be interpreted in a risk assessment context. However, prior to routine use in regulatory settings, further research will be required to address the remaining uncertainties and limitations.
Keywords: clastogen; genetic toxicology; mutation; new approach methodologies.
© 2023 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics Society. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of [Health Canada].
Similar articles
-
Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 3;627(1):59-77. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Dec 1. Mutat Res. 2007. PMID: 17141553
-
Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 Jun;58(5):264-283. doi: 10.1002/em.22045. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017. PMID: 27650663 Review.
-
How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.Mutat Res. 2007 Mar 30;628(1):31-55. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 13. Mutat Res. 2007. PMID: 17293159
-
Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing.Mutat Res. 2011 Aug 16;723(2):108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.005. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Mutat Res. 2011. PMID: 21182982
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
Cited by
-
Impacts of Inorganic Arsenic Exposure on Genetic Stability of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.J Appl Toxicol. 2025 Aug;45(8):1555-1571. doi: 10.1002/jat.4785. Epub 2025 Apr 16. J Appl Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 40241300 Free PMC article.
-
Benchmark Response (BMR) Values for In Vivo Mutagenicity Endpoints.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025 Apr;66(4):172-184. doi: 10.1002/em.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 4. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2025. PMID: 40186380 Free PMC article.
-
A benchmark concentration-based strategy for evaluating the combined effects of genotoxic compounds in TK6 cells.Arch Toxicol. 2025 Apr;99(4):1581-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-03971-y. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Arch Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 39945817 Free PMC article.
-
A novel support vector machine-based 1-day, single-dose prediction model of genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity in rats.Arch Toxicol. 2024 Aug;98(8):2711-2730. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03755-w. Epub 2024 May 18. Arch Toxicol. 2024. PMID: 38762666
-
Quantitative genotoxicity assessment of N-nitrosodimethylamine in mice by error-corrected next-generation sequencing and DNA methylation quantification for toxicity threshold determination.Arch Toxicol. 2025 Aug 24. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04166-1. Online ahead of print. Arch Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 40849524
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adler, S., Basketter, D., Creton, S., Pelkonen, O., van Benthem, J., Zuang, V. et al. (2011) Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010. Archives of Toxicology, 85, 367-485.
-
- Ames, B.N., Gurney, E.G., Miller, J.A. & Bartsch, H. (1972a) Carcinogens as frameshift mutagens: metabolites and derivatives of 2-acetylaminofluorene and other aromatic amine carcinogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 69, 3128-3132.
-
- Ames, B.N., Lee, F.D. & Durston, W.E. (1973a) An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70, 782-786.
-
- Ames, B.N., Sims, P. & Grover, P.L. (1972b) Epoxides of carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons are frameshift mutagens. Science, 176, 47-49.
-
- Ames, B.N., Durston, W.E., Yamasaki, E. & Lee, F.D. (1973b) Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70, 2281-2285.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources