Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review
- PMID: 38115340
- PMCID: PMC10727550
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036671
Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review
Abstract
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics in healthcare heralds a new era of medical innovation, promising enhanced diagnostics, streamlined processes, and improved patient care. However, this technological revolution is accompanied by intricate ethical implications that demand meticulous consideration. This article navigates the complex ethical terrain surrounding AI and robotics in healthcare, delving into specific dimensions and providing strategies and best practices for ethical navigation. Privacy and data security are paramount concerns, necessitating robust encryption and anonymization techniques to safeguard patient data. Responsible data handling practices, including decentralized data sharing, are critical to preserve patient privacy. Algorithmic bias poses a significant challenge, demanding diverse datasets and ongoing monitoring to ensure fairness. Transparency and explainability in AI decision-making processes enhance trust and accountability. Clear responsibility frameworks are essential to address the accountability of manufacturers, healthcare institutions, and professionals. Ethical guidelines, regularly updated and accessible to all stakeholders, guide decision-making in this dynamic landscape. Moreover, the societal implications of AI and robotics extend to accessibility, equity, and societal trust. Strategies to bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access must be prioritized. Global collaboration is pivotal in developing adaptable regulations and addressing legal challenges like liability and intellectual property. Ethics must remain at the forefront in the ever-evolving realm of healthcare technology. By embracing these strategies and best practices, healthcare systems and professionals can harness the potential of AI and robotics, ensuring responsible and ethical integration that benefits patients while upholding the highest ethical standards.
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Fernández-Alemán JL, Señor IC, Lozoya PA, et al. Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46:541–62. - PubMed
-
- Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, et al. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447–53. - PubMed
-
- Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, et al. The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 2016;3. doi: 10.1177/2053951716679679.
-
- Calo R, Froomkin AM, Kerr I. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. SSRN Electron J. 2017;51:399. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3015350 [access date July 4, 2023].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical