Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 9;8(1):e001131.
doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001131. eCollection 2023.

Implementation of a novel thoracostomy tube trainer with real-time feedback

Affiliations

Implementation of a novel thoracostomy tube trainer with real-time feedback

Shruti Hegde et al. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Simulation-based training leads to improved clinical performance but may be influenced by quality and frequency of training. Within simulation training, chest tube insertion remains a challenge as one of the main pitfalls of insertion is a controlled pleural entry. This study evaluates the efficacy of a novel training model with real-time pressure monitoring, the average force to pleural entry in a model and the utility of audio and visual feedback.

Methods: This proprietary training model comprised a modified Kelly clamp device with three force sensors at the index finger (sensor 1) and two finger loops (sensors 2 and 3), and a manikin with a replaceable chest wall pad. Standard force values (Newtons (N)) were obtained by experts; expert data revealed that 3-5 s was an acceptable time range to complete the chest tube insertion. Participant level ranged from Post-graduate Year (PGY)-1 to PGY-6 with 13 total participants. Each individual was provided an introduction to the procedure and chest tube trainer. Force (N) and time (ms) measurements were obtained from entry through dermis to pleural space puncture. A significant pressure drop suggested puncturing through the chest wall (completion of the procedure).

Results: Force data were captured during each phase of the procedure-linear, plateau, and drop. Linear phase (~3000 ms) was from start of procedure to point of maximum force (<30 N). Plateau phase was from maximum force to just before a drop in pressure. Drop phase was a drop in pressure by 5+ N in a span of 150 ms signaling completion of procedure. All participants were able to complete the task successfully. Force for pleural entry ranged from 17 N to 30 N; time to pleural entry ranged from 7500 to 15 000 ms. There was variability in use of all three sensors. All participants used the index sensor, however there was variability in the use of the loop sensors depending on the handedness of the participant. Left-handed users relied more on sensors 1 and 3 while right-handed users relied more on sensors 1 and 2. Given this variability, only force measurements from sensor 1 were used for assessment.

Conclusions: This novel force-sensing chest tube trainer with continuous pressuring monitoring has a wide range of applications in simulation-based training of emergency surgical tasks. Next steps include evaluating its impact on accuracy and efficiency. Applications of real-time feedback measuring force are broad, including vascular access, trocar placement and other common procedures.

Level of evidence: Level IV, prospective study.

Keywords: education, medical; patient simulation; thoracic surgical procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CP is an advisor to TraumaCare.AI, a machine-learning entity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final Kelly clamp case prototype with one sensor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kelly clamp case connected to display system with audio and visual components.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Customized three-dimensional printed clamp attached to sensors; chest wall manikin with replaceable chest wall pads.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Force (N) of pleural entry over time (ms).

References

    1. Platnick C, Witt CE, Pieracci FM, Robinson CK, Lawless R, Burlew CC, Moore EE, Cohen M, Platnick KB. Beyond the tube: can we reduce chest tube complications in trauma patients? Am J Surg 2021;222:1023–8. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pieracci FM, Burlew CC, Spain D, Livingston DH, Bulger EM, Davis KA, Michetti C. Tube thoracostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance and recommendations from the AAST acute care surgery and critical care committees. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020;5:e000498. 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000498 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez MC, El Khatib M, Prokop L, Zielinski MD, Aho JM. Complications in tube thoracostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;85:410–6. 10.1097/TA.0000000000001840 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Overtoom EM, Horeman T, Jansen F-W, Dankelman J, Schreuder HWR. Haptic feedback, force feedback, and force-sensing in simulation training for laparoscopy: a systematic overview. J Surg Educ 2019;76:242–61. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trejos AL, Patel RV, Malthaner RA, Schlachta CM. Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2106–19. 10.1007/s00464-014-3442-9 - DOI - PubMed