Randomised trial of genetic testing and targeted intervention to prevent the development and progression of Paget's disease of bone
- PMID: 38123339
- PMCID: PMC10958267
- DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224990
Randomised trial of genetic testing and targeted intervention to prevent the development and progression of Paget's disease of bone
Abstract
Introduction: Paget's disease of bone (PDB) frequently presents at an advanced stage with irreversible skeletal damage. Clinical outcomes might be improved by earlier diagnosis and prophylactic treatment.
Methods: We randomised 222 individuals at increased risk of PDB because of pathogenic SQSTM1 variants to receive 5 mg zoledronic acid (ZA) or placebo. The primary outcome was new bone lesions assessed by radionuclide bone scan. Secondary outcomes included change in existing lesions, biochemical markers of bone turnover and skeletal events related to PDB.
Results: The median duration of follow-up was 84 months (range 0-127) and 180 participants (81%) completed the study. At baseline, 9 (8.1%) of the ZA group had PDB lesions vs 12 (10.8%) of the placebo group. Two of the placebo group developed new lesions versus none in the ZA group (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.00 to 3.43, p=0.25). Eight of the placebo group had a poor outcome (lesions which were new, unchanged or progressing) compared with none of the ZA group (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.42, p=0.003). At the study end, 1 participant in the ZA group had lesions compared with 11 in the placebo group. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were significantly reduced in the ZA group. One participant allocated to placebo required rescue therapy with ZA because of symptomatic disease. The number and severity of adverse events did not differ between groups.
Conclusions: Genetic testing for pathogenic SQSTM1 variants coupled with intervention with ZA is well tolerated and has favourable effects on the progression of early PDB.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN11616770.
Keywords: Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pharmacogenetics; Therapeutics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DS reports receiving honoraria from GE Healthcare outside the submitted work; OC reports receiving lecture fees from Nordic Pharma and financial support for attending conferences from Abbvie, outside the submitted work; GH reports funding from the Royal Osteoporosis Society to her institution and honoraria from Amgen and UCB outside the submitted work; JT reports funding to his institution from the Wellcome trust and Medical Research Council, outside the submitted work and that he is chair of the Royal Osteoporosis Society Research and Innovation grant assessment panel; SYM report receiving lecture fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work; RC reports funding to her institution from Kyowa Kirin and Amgen outside the submitted work; WDF reports funding to his institution from Novartis, Takeda, NPS Pharma, Sanofi, Amolyt and Entera-Bio Pharma outside the submitted work and donation of assay materials and evaluation kits from Abbot Diagnostics outside the submitted work; NG reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, UCB, Lilly and Gedeon Richter and support from UCB for attending conferences outside the submitted work; MJS reports funding to his institution from Amgen and Allergen outside the submitted work and funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to his institution outside the submitted work; MKK reports funding to his institution from the Medical Research Futures Fund; GM is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Osteoporosis Australia; SHR reports funding to his institution from Kyowa Kirin, UCB, the Paget’s Association and the Royal Osteoporosis Society outside the submitted work. The other authors have no interests to declare.
Figures


References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources