Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49077.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.49077. eCollection 2023 Nov.

A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

Affiliations
Review

A Literature Review of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy (RRN) Versus Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (LRN) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

Muhannad Alzamzami et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an adenocarcinoma of the renal cortex. Radical nephrectomy remains the standard of care for managing massive renal tumours. Robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy is an increasing alternative technique to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). The da Vinci Surgical System allows for improved dexterity, increased visualisation, tremor filtration and an ergonomic setting to enhance surgeon comfort. The aim was to compare the perioperative outcomes pertaining to operative time, intraoperative complications, blood loss and length of hospital stay between the robotic and LRN for RCC. Studies that compared the perioperative findings between robotic radical nephrectomy (RNN) and LRN for RCC were included. The literature review was carried out according to the Cochrane collaboration standards where applicable. Highly sensitive search strategies like MeSH terms and controlled vocabularies were used to identify relevant studies that compare the RNN outcomes to the LRN. Following the literature search, a total of 73 articles were collected, 60 articles were excluded at the stage of reviewing the titles, eight articles were excluded after reading the abstracts, and five articles were included in this paper. Five studies were included in this analysis, with a total sample size of 1770 patients, 735 were in the robotic arm, and 1035 were in the laparoscopic arm. Generally, there were no differences between both arms in terms of demographic data and age of patients. Closer analysis of the perioperative outcomes did not reveal significant differences between the two groups related to the estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay or post-operative complications. The laparoscopic techniques have less operative time than the robotic ones. RRN is an expanding approach for patients with RCC with some potential technical benefits over laparoscopic ones. RRN is similar to LRN in the perioperative outcomes, with few potential drawbacks of RRN, including higher costs. However, a prospective comparison of RRN with LRN in many cases at multiple centres with long-term oncological results best illustrates the status of RRN versus LRN.

Keywords: laparoscopic radical nephrectomy; radical nephrectomy; renal cancer; robot-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy; robotic radical nephrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Search methodology
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary of bias assessment for included studies
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of bias assessment for included studies
Anele 2019 [3], Hemal 2008 [4], Helmers 2016 [5], Golombos 2016 [6], White 2011 [7]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Analysis of the operative time outcomes
Anele 2019 [3], Hemal 2008 [4], Helmers 2016 [5], Golombos 2016 [6], White 2011 [7]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Analysis of the estimated blood loss (EBL)
Anele 2019 [3], Hemal 2008 [4], Helmers 2016 [5], Golombos 2016 [6], White 2011 [7]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Analysis of the length of stay (LOS)
Anele 2019 [3], Hemal 2008 [4], Helmers 2016 [5], Golombos 2016 [6], White 2011 [7]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Analysis of post-operative complications
Anele 2019 [3], Hemal 2008 [4], Helmers 2016 [5], Golombos 2016 [6], White 2011 [7]

References

    1. Reynard J, Brewster SF, Biers S, Neal NL. Naomi Neal, Oxford Handbook of Urology. Vol. 4. Oxford University Press; 2019. Oxford Handbook of Urology.
    1. EAU Guidelines. European Association of Urology Pocket Guidelines. 2020. https://uroweb.org/news/eau-guidelines-2020-now-available-online https://uroweb.org/news/eau-guidelines-2020-now-available-online
    1. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a large multi-institutional analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group) Anele UA, Marchioni M, Yang B, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30734072/ World J Urol. 2019;37:2439–2450. - PubMed
    1. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. Hemal AK, Kumar A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18704439/ World J Urol. 2009;27:89–94. - PubMed
    1. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparative analysis and cost considerations. Helmers MR, Ball MW, Gorin MA, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27705727/ Can J Urol. 2016;23:8435–8440. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources