Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 6:5:1297073.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1297073. eCollection 2023.

Medical practitioner perspectives on AI in emergency triage

Affiliations

Medical practitioner perspectives on AI in emergency triage

Beverley A Townsend et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: A proposed Diagnostic AI System for Robot-Assisted Triage ("DAISY") is under development to support Emergency Department ("ED") triage following increasing reports of overcrowding and shortage of staff in ED care experienced within National Health Service, England ("NHS") but also globally. DAISY aims to reduce ED patient wait times and medical practitioner overload. The objective of this study was to explore NHS health practitioners' perspectives and attitudes towards the future use of AI-supported technologies in ED triage.

Methods: Between July and August 2022 a qualitative-exploratory research study was conducted to collect and capture the perceptions and attitudes of nine NHS healthcare practitioners to better understand the challenges and benefits of a DAISY deployment. The study was based on a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. The study involved qualitative data analysis of the interviewees' responses. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim, and notes included into data documents. The transcripts were coded line-by-line, and data were organised into themes and sub-themes. Both inductive and deductive approaches to thematic analysis were used to analyse such data.

Results: Based on a qualitative analysis of coded interviews with the practitioners, responses were categorised into broad main thematic-types, namely: trust; current practice; social, legal, ethical, and cultural concerns; and empathetic practice. Sub-themes were identified for each main theme. Further quantitative analyses explored the vocabulary and sentiments of the participants when talking generally about NHS ED practices compared to discussing DAISY. Limitations include a small sample size and the requirement that research participants imagine a prototype AI-supported system still under development. The expectation is that such a system would work alongside the practitioner. Findings can be generalisable to other healthcare AI-supported systems and to other domains.

Discussion: This study highlights the benefits and challenges for an AI-supported triage healthcare solution. The study shows that most NHS ED practitioners interviewed were positive about such adoption. Benefits cited were a reduction in patient wait times in the ED, assistance in the streamlining of the triage process, support in calling for appropriate diagnostics and for further patient examination, and identification of those very unwell and requiring more immediate and urgent attention. Words used to describe the system were that DAISY is a "good idea", "help", helpful, "easier", "value", and "accurate". Our study demonstrates that trust in the system is a significant driver of use and a potential barrier to adoption. Participants emphasised social, legal, ethical, and cultural considerations and barriers to DAISY adoption and the importance of empathy and non-verbal cues in patient interactions. Findings demonstrate how DAISY might support and augment human medical performance in ED care, and provide an understanding of attitudinal barriers and considerations for the development and implementation of future triage AI-supported systems.

Keywords: Diagnostic AI System for Robot-Assisted A & E Triage (DAISY); attitudes; emergency department triage; medical practitioners; perceptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Charts of the emotional positivity proportion (positive vs negative) for each participant (n=9) on the overall (all-text) text (left) and the DAISY-text (right). The bars show the proportion of positive text sections vs negative text sections for each participant (P1-P9) using the data in Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the main themes and their linked sub-themes (shown by dashed outlines) that were elicited from the participant interviews. Trust is the over-arching theme elicited from the interviews.

References

    1. Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovich J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PloS One. (2018) 13(8):e0203316. 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pines JM, Bernstein SL. Solving the worldwide emergency department crowding problem–what can we learn from an Israeli ED? Isr J Health Policy Res. (2015) 4(1):1–4. 10.1186/s13584-015-0049-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pines JM, Griffey RT. What we have learned from a decade of ED crowding research. Acad Emerg Med. (2015) 22(8):985–7. 10.1111/acem.12716 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asplin BR, Magid DJ, Rhodes KV, Solberg LI, Lurie N, Camargo CA. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med. (2003) 42(2):173–80. 10.1067/mem.2003.302 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Emergency Medicine. Snapshot survey and results (covering the period 27 June to 3 July 2022). Available at: https://rcem.ac.uk/two-thirds-ae-clinical-leads-not-confident-organisati... and https://rcem.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/SNAPS_July_2022.pdf (Accessed August 8, 2023).

LinkOut - more resources