Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 1;79(4):gbad179.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad179.

Step-Gap in Upward Support: The Role of Biological Relatedness and Childhood Co-residence Duration

Affiliations

Step-Gap in Upward Support: The Role of Biological Relatedness and Childhood Co-residence Duration

Hans Hämäläinen et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: Although prior research has detected a step-gap in intergenerational relationships in various aspects, there is a lack of studies examining adult children's support toward their biological parents and stepparents. We investigated (i) whether adult children provide more support to their biological parents than stepparents and (ii) whether the childhood co-residence duration is associated with the support given to stepparents.

Methods: The data were drawn from the German Family Panel (pairfam). Upward support was indicated by using 3 different measures, namely, financial, practical, and emotional support provided by adult children to their biological parents and stepparents. A path analysis was conducted to detect the potential differences regarding upward support.

Results: More support was channeled toward the biological parents than the stepparents. Moreover, the length of co-residence during childhood and adolescence was positively associated with the frequency of support provided toward the stepparents. Consequently, an increased childhood co-residence duration decreased the step-gap in upward support, although it did not fully eliminate it.

Discussion: The findings showed that stepparents are in a more disadvantaged position than the biological parents regarding receiving support from their adult children. In the context of a high old-age dependency ratio, it is important to recognize that stepparents may not have the opportunity to receive adequate support from their families as compared to individuals with biological children.

Keywords: Biological children; Biological parents; Intergenerational help; Stepchildren; Stepparents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Support to parents and stepparents (predictive margins and standard errors; N = 8,949).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Support to the stepparents based on the childhood co-residence duration (predictive margins and standard errors; N = 984).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arat, E., Poortman, A. R., & van der Lippe, T. (2021). Parental involvement in stepfamilies: Biology, relationship type, residence, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(5), 773–790. 10.1111/jomf.12817 - DOI
    1. Arránz Becker, O. A., Salzburger, V., Lois, N., & Nauck, B. (2013). What narrows the stepgap? Closeness between parents and adult (step)children in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(5), 1130–1148. 10.1111/jomf.12052 - DOI
    1. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x - DOI
    1. Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 856–870. 10.2307/352993 - DOI
    1. Brandt, M., Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2009). Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 585–601. 10.1093/esr/jcn076 - DOI

Publication types