Step-Gap in Upward Support: The Role of Biological Relatedness and Childhood Co-residence Duration
- PMID: 38127143
- PMCID: PMC10944143
- DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbad179
Step-Gap in Upward Support: The Role of Biological Relatedness and Childhood Co-residence Duration
Abstract
Objectives: Although prior research has detected a step-gap in intergenerational relationships in various aspects, there is a lack of studies examining adult children's support toward their biological parents and stepparents. We investigated (i) whether adult children provide more support to their biological parents than stepparents and (ii) whether the childhood co-residence duration is associated with the support given to stepparents.
Methods: The data were drawn from the German Family Panel (pairfam). Upward support was indicated by using 3 different measures, namely, financial, practical, and emotional support provided by adult children to their biological parents and stepparents. A path analysis was conducted to detect the potential differences regarding upward support.
Results: More support was channeled toward the biological parents than the stepparents. Moreover, the length of co-residence during childhood and adolescence was positively associated with the frequency of support provided toward the stepparents. Consequently, an increased childhood co-residence duration decreased the step-gap in upward support, although it did not fully eliminate it.
Discussion: The findings showed that stepparents are in a more disadvantaged position than the biological parents regarding receiving support from their adult children. In the context of a high old-age dependency ratio, it is important to recognize that stepparents may not have the opportunity to receive adequate support from their families as compared to individuals with biological children.
Keywords: Biological children; Biological parents; Intergenerational help; Stepchildren; Stepparents.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Stepfamily Structure on Older Parents' Frequency of Contact With and Care Receipt From Adult Biological and Stepchildren in the Netherlands.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5):gbaf015. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf015. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025. PMID: 39869036 Free PMC article.
-
Former stepparents' contact with their stepchildren after midlife.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 May;68(3):409-19. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt021. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013. PMID: 23591569 Free PMC article.
-
Parental involvement in youth and closeness to parents during adulthood: Stepparents and biological parents.J Fam Psychol. 2020 Oct;34(7):794-803. doi: 10.1037/fam0000659. Epub 2020 Apr 2. J Fam Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32237878
-
The influence of family structure on the contact between older parents and their adult biological children and stepchildren in the Netherlands.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Mar;65B(2):236-45. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp108. Epub 2009 Dec 11. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010. PMID: 20008027
-
Changing views on intergenerational ties.Gerontology. 2013;59(1):64-70. doi: 10.1159/000342211. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Gerontology. 2013. PMID: 23037718 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Stepfamily Structure on Older Parents' Frequency of Contact With and Care Receipt From Adult Biological and Stepchildren in the Netherlands.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5):gbaf015. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf015. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025. PMID: 39869036 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arat, E., Poortman, A. R., & van der Lippe, T. (2021). Parental involvement in stepfamilies: Biology, relationship type, residence, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(5), 773–790. 10.1111/jomf.12817 - DOI
-
- Arránz Becker, O. A., Salzburger, V., Lois, N., & Nauck, B. (2013). What narrows the stepgap? Closeness between parents and adult (step)children in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(5), 1130–1148. 10.1111/jomf.12052 - DOI
-
- Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x - DOI
-
- Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 856–870. 10.2307/352993 - DOI
-
- Brandt, M., Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2009). Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 585–601. 10.1093/esr/jcn076 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous