Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy: a randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety in children with unerupted mandibular third molars
- PMID: 38127199
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05422-3
Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy: a randomized clinical trial on pain and anxiety in children with unerupted mandibular third molars
Abstract
Objective: Dental anxiety for unerupted mandibular third molars extraction in children under local anesthesia is a tricky problem. The purpose of this study was to compare psychological and physiologic findings of extractions of unerupted mandibular third molars in children by piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy.
Materials and methods: This prospective, single-center, double-blind study included children who required extraction of mandibular third molars under local anesthesia. All subjects were randomly divided into two groups: piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy (control). The primary outcome variables were dental anxiety assessed by the Modified Child Fear Survey Schedule Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS) and postoperative pain qualified by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcome variables included blood pressure, heart rate, saturation, and operation duration. The data were analyzed by t-test and chi-square test (P ≤ 0.05).
Results: All 40 study patients (37.5% males and 62.5% females with an average age of 14.43 ± 1.32 years) completed the entire trial. There were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of gender allocation, age, side of extraction, and Winter's Classification (P > 0.05). The operation duration of the piezosurgery group was significantly longer than the conventional osteotomy group (P < 0.01). The VAS scores showed that pain levels of children in the piezosurgery group were significantly less than the conventional osteotomy group on the first and third days postoperatively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). The CFSS-DS score in the piezosurgery group significantly decreased compared to the conventional osteotomy group (P < 0.05). Compared with the conventional osteotomy group, a significant decrease in heart rate, and lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures were observed after extraction in the piezosurgery group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion: Compared with conventional osteotomy, piezosurgery can effectively reduce postoperative pain and have some effect in relieving dental anxiety for the extraction of unerupted mandibular third molars in children.
Clinical relevance: Piezosurgery may be a viable technique for the extraction of unerupted mandibular third molars in children under local anesthesia.
Keywords: Children; Dental anxiety; Pain; Piezosurgery; Unerupted mandibular third molars.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;80(6):1078-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 18. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 35300957
-
Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01759-x. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 34380473 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(41):e1685. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001685. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26469902 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postoperative evaluation of Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and rotary systems used for osteotomy in mandibular third-molar extractions.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;49(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 28. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33298388
-
Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Dent Sci. 2018 Dec;13(4):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.09.006. Epub 2018 Aug 4. J Dent Sci. 2018. PMID: 30895143 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Piezosurgery in Third Molar Extractions: A Systematic Review.J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121158. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39728070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Comparative Efficacy of Burs Versus Piezoelectric Techniques in Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review Following the PRISMA Guidelines.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 12;60(12):2049. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122049. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39768928 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources