Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities
- PMID: 38127253
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02825-y
Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities
Abstract
Although previous studies have investigated the relationship between inhibition of return (IOR) and multisensory integration, the influence of non-spatial has not been explored. The present study aimed to investigate the influence of non-spatial IOR on audiovisual integration by using a "prime-neutral cue-target" paradigm. In Experiment 1, which manipulated prime validity and target modality, the targets were positioned centrally, revealing significant non-spatial IOR effects in the visual, auditory, and audiovisual modalities. Analysis of relative multisensory response enhancement (rMRE) indicated substantial audiovisual integration enhancement in both valid and invalid target conditions. Furthermore, the enhancement was weaker for valid targets than for invalid targets. In Experiment 2, the targets were positioned above and below to rule out repetition blindness (RB); this experiment successfully replicated the results observed in Experiment 1. Notably, Experiments 1 and 2 consistently found that the correlation between modality differences and rMRE for valid targets indicated that differences in signal strength between visual and auditory modalities contributed to a reduction in audiovisual integration. However, the absence of correlation with the invalid target suggests that attention, as a key factor, may play a significant role in this process. The present study highlights how non-spatial IOR reduces audiovisual integration and sheds light on the complex interaction between attention and multisensory integration.
Keywords: Audiovisual integration; Non-spatial IOR; Race model; rMRE.
© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):1093-1107. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05488-0. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 30770958
-
Cue modality modulates interaction between exogenous spatial attention and audiovisual integration.Exp Brain Res. 2024 Dec 19;243(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06970-0. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 39699643
-
Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.7. J Vis. 2022. PMID: 35297999 Free PMC article.
-
Electrophysiological evidence of different neural processing between visual and audiovisual inhibition of return.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 13;11(1):8056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86999-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33850180 Free PMC article.
-
Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):521-538. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000435. Ear Hear. 2017. PMID: 28399064 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alsius, A., Navarra, J., Campbell, R., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005). Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology, 15(9), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.046 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B., & Driver, J. (2000). The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205552 - DOI
-
- Baart, M., Stekelenburg, J. J., & Vroomen, J. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration. Neuropsychologia, 53, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Carrasco, I. (2014). Gender gap in innovation: an institutionalist explanation. Management Decision, 52(2), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2012-0533 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources