Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):325-334.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5456.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Alone vs Preceded by Bevacizumab, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Untreated Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Alone vs Preceded by Bevacizumab, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Untreated Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Tom Wei-Wu Chen et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Treatments to extend the control of brain metastasis are urgently required.

Objective: To investigate whether the addition of an induction treatment of bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEEP) improves brain-specific progression-free survival (PFS) after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

Design, setting, and participants: This open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial assessed patients with brain metastases from breast cancer (BMBC) in Taiwan from September 9, 2014, to December 24, 2018, with survival follow-up until December 31, 2021. Key inclusion criteria included metastatic brain tumors not suitable for focal treatment, WBRT naivety, age 20 to 75 years, and at least 1 measurable brain metastatic lesion. The primary end point was brain-specific PFS, with an expected hazard ratio of 0.60, a 2-sided α ≤ .20, and power of 0.8.

Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to the experimental arm, which involved 3 cycles of BEEP followed by WBRT, or the control arm, which involved WBRT alone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the determination of brain-specific PFS by local investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, the initiation of other brain-directed treatment after WBRT, or death. Other key end points included brain-specific objective response rate after 8 weeks of BEEP treatment or WBRT and 8-month brain-specific PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival.

Results: A total of 118 patients with BMBC were randomized, with the intention-to-treat cohort comprising 112 patients. The median age was 56 years (range, 34-71 years), and 61 patients (54.5%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive disease. The median (range) brain-specific PFS was 8.1 (0.3-29.5) vs 6.5 (0.9-25.5) months in the experimental and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44-1.13; P = .15; significant at predefined α ≤ .20). The brain-specific objective response rate at 2 months was not significantly different (BEEP treatment vs WBRT, 41.9% vs 52.6%), but the 8-month brain-specific PFS rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (48.7% vs 26.3%; P = .03). Adverse events were generally manageable with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings show that induction BEEP before WBRT may improve the control of BMBC compared with using upfront WBRT, which could address an unmet need for an effective systemic treatment for intractable brain and extracranial metastases from metastatic breast cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02185352.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr T. Chen reported receiving personal fees from Roche during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Novartis, Eisai, and Eli Lilly outside the submitted work. Dr D.-Y. Chang reported receiving lecture and/or consulting fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and CANbridge Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Prof Cheng reported receiving consulting fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, IPSEN Innovation, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; speakers’ bureau fees from Amgen Taiwan; and travel support from Eisai outside the submitted work. Prof Lu reported receiving grants from MSD, Roche, Novartis, and AstraZeneca and speaker fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, Novartis, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Disposition Flowchart
BEEP indicates bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin; WBRT, whole-brain radiotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Survival Rates and Changes in Brain Tumor Size in the Experimental (n = 74) vs Control (n = 38) Arm
A, Median brain-specific progression-free survival (PFS), 8.1 months (range, 0.3-29.5 months) vs 6.5 months (range, 0.9-25.5 months). B, Median PFS, 6.4 months (range, 0.3-29.5 months) vs 4.7 months (range, 0.9-25.5 months). C, Footnote a indicates 3 patients treated with bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEEP) who had new brain lesions as follows: 1 experienced relapse with new lesions (5.8% growth), 1 experienced relapse with new ependymal metastasis (45.1% shrinkage), and 1 had leptomeningeal metastasis. D, Footnote a indicates 1 patient in the whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)–alone arm who experienced relapse with new brain lesions (2.6% growth) and 1 who had leptomeningeal metastasis. In panels C and D, the dotted lines indicate thresholds for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 disease progression (≥20%) and partial response (less than or equal to −30%). HR indicates hazard ratio.

References

    1. Lin NU, Bellon JR, Winer EP. CNS metastases in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(17):3608-3617. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.01.175 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee SS, Ahn JH, Kim MK, et al. . Brain metastases in breast cancer: prognostic factors and management. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(3):523-530. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9806-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arslan C, Dizdar O, Altundag K. Systemic treatment in breast-cancer patients with brain metastasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(7):1089-1100. doi:10.1517/14656561003702412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lockman PR, Mittapalli RK, Taskar KS, et al. . Heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier permeability determines drug efficacy in experimental brain metastases of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(23):5664-5678. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1564 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harputluoglu H, Dizdar O, Aksoy S, et al. . Characteristics of breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases: a single-center experience. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(5):521-526. doi:10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31298-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data