Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Bridging Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- PMID: 38128500
- PMCID: PMC10857025
- DOI: 10.1159/000535796
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Bridging Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Abstract
Background: There is unclear added benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of comparing EVT with IVT versus EVT alone.
Methods: We used a decision tree to examine the short-term costs and outcomes at 90 days after the occurrence of index stroke to compare the cost-effectiveness of EVT alone with EVT plus IVT for patients with stroke. Subsequently, we developed a Markov state transition model to assess the costs and outcomes over 1-year, 5-year, and 20-year time horizons. We estimated total and incremental cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Results: The average costs per patient were estimated to be $47,304, $49,510, $59,770, and $76,561 for EVT-only strategy and $55,482, $57,751, $68,314, and $85,611 for EVT with IVT over 90 days, 1 year, 5 years, and 20 years, respectively. The cost saving of EVT-only strategy was driven by the avoided medication costs of IVT (ranging from $8,178 to $9,050). The additional IVT led to a slight decrease in QALY estimate during the 90-day time horizon (loss of 0.002 QALY), but a small gain over 1-year and 5-year time horizons (0.011 and 0.0636 QALY). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained, the probabilities of EVT only being cost-effective were 100%, 100%, and 99.3% over 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year time horizons.
Conclusion: Our cost-effectiveness model suggested that EVT only may be cost-effective for patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion.
Keywords: Cost; Cost-effectiveness; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolytic.
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy alone versus alteplase before thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results from the DIRECT-MT.J Neurosurg. 2023 Feb 10;139(3):678-686. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS221791. Print 2023 Sep 1. J Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 36790013 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.J Neurosurg. 2023 Jan 20;139(3):721-731. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS222115. Print 2023 Sep 1. J Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 36670531
-
Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes with and without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Ischemic Cores Identified with CT or MRI.Radiology. 2023 Oct;309(1):e230440. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230440. Radiology. 2023. PMID: 37847131
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.J Neurosurg. 2022 Jun 10;138(1):223-232. doi: 10.3171/2022.4.JNS22514. Print 2023 Jan 1. J Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35901768 Review.
-
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Feb 8;16(4):1-79. eCollection 2016. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016. PMID: 27026799 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Costs of Neurological Disorders.Neuroepidemiology. 2024;58(6):409-411. doi: 10.1159/000539370. Epub 2024 May 22. Neuroepidemiology. 2024. PMID: 38768584 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, et al. . Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–29. - PubMed
-
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study GroupStroke rt PASSG . Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581–7. - PubMed
-
- Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, Molina CA, Garami Z, Calleja S, et al. . Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(3):948–54. - PubMed
-
- Siegler JE, Jovin TG. Thrombolysis before thrombectomy in acute large vessel occlusion: a risk/benefit assessment and review of the evidence. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2020;22(8):22.
-
- Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. . Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929–35. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical