Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;88(2):103-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.12.007. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

Development and validation of the Baseline Recurrence Risk in Cellulitis (BRRISC) score

Affiliations

Development and validation of the Baseline Recurrence Risk in Cellulitis (BRRISC) score

Elizabeth L A Cross et al. J Infect. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Cellulitis is often treated with antibiotics for longer than recommended by guidelines. Prolonged therapy may reduce recurrence in certain patients, but it is not known which patients are at greatest risk. Our objective was to develop and temporally validate a risk prediction score to identify patients attending hospital with cellulitis at highest risk of recurrence.

Methods: We included UK adult patients with cellulitis attending hospital in an electronic health records (EHR) study to identify demographic, comorbid, physiological, and laboratory factors predicting recurrence (before death) within 90 days, using multivariable logistic regression with backwards elimination in complete cases. A points-based risk score integerised model coefficients for selected predictors. Performance was assessed using the C-index in development and temporal validation samples.

Results: The final model included 4938 patients treated for median 8 days (IQR 6-11); 8.8% (n = 436) experienced hospitalisation-associated recurrence. A risk score using eight variables (age, heart rate, urea, platelets, albumin, previous cellulitis, venous insufficiency, and liver disease) ranged from 0-15, with C-index = 0.65 (95%CI: 0.63-0.68). Categorising as low (score 0-1), medium (2-5) and high (6-15) risk, recurrence increased fourfold; 3.2% (95%CI: 2.3-4.4%), 9.7% (8.7-10.8%), and 16.6% (13.3-20.4%). Performance was maintained in the validation sample (C-index = 0.63 (95%CI: 0.58-0.67)). Among patients at high risk, four distinct clinical phenotypes were identified using hierarchical clustering 1) young, acutely unwell with liver disease; 2) comorbid with previous cellulitis and venous insufficiency; 3) chronic renal disease with severe renal impairment; and 4) acute severe illness, with substantial inflammatory responses.

Conclusions: Risk of cellulitis recurrence varies markedly according to individual patient factors captured in the Baseline Recurrence Risk in Cellulitis (BRRISC) score. Further work is needed to optimise the score, considering baseline and treatment response variables not captured in EHR data, and establish the utility of risk-based approaches to guide optimal antibiotic duration.

Keywords: Antibiotic duration; Cellulitis; Recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participants for development sample. *Original extract included all admissions with any episode with any cellulitis diagnosis code, bursitis code (M71.1), or necrotising fasciitis code (M72.6).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observed (95%CI) and predicted percentage with recurrence per score total (top) and frequency distribution of recurrence score (bottom), in development and validation samples. For the validation sample, 2 patients with scores >10 shown as scores = 10.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
For 436 patients at high risk of recurrence (score total 6) in the development sample, (a) distribution of age, physiological and laboratory variables and (b) sex and co-morbidities across four clinical phenotypes identified from clustering. Group 1 - young, systemically unwell with liver disease and immunosuppression; Group 2 - previous cellulitis and venous insufficiency; Group 3 - significant renal impairment with chronic renal disease; Group 4 -acute severe illness with substantial inflammatory response.

References

    1. Stevens D.L., Bisno A.L., Chambers H.F., Dellinger E.P., Goldstein E.J., Gorbach S.L., et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):147–159. - PubMed
    1. Tun K., Shurko J.F., Ryan L., Lee G.C. Age-based health and economic burden of skin and soft tissue infections in the United States, 2000 and 2012. PLoS One. 2018;13(11) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cross E.L.A., Jordan H., Godfrey R., Onakpoya I.J., Shears A., Fidler K., et al. Route and duration of antibiotic therapy in acute cellulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and harms of antibiotic treatment. J Infect. 2020;81(4):521–531. - PubMed
    1. Collazos J., de la Fuente B., Garcia A., Gomez H., Menendez C., Enriquez H., et al. Cellulitis in adult patients: A large, multicenter, observational, prospective study of 606 episodes and analysis of the factors related to the response to treatment. PLoS One. 2018;13(9) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannon J., Dyer J., Carapetis J., Manning L. Epidemiology and risk factors for recurrent severe lower limb cellulitis: a longitudinal cohort study. Clin Micro Infect. 2018;24(10):1084–1088. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances