Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023;12(2):20-28.
doi: 10.52547/wjps.12.2.20.

Treatment Options of Maxillofacial Fractures in Iran: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Treatment Options of Maxillofacial Fractures in Iran: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Faeze Sharifi et al. World J Plast Surg. 2023.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the treatment options of maxillofacial fractures in Iran, complementing a previous article regarding causes and the overall prevalence.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WS) and Google Scholar (GS) electronic databases was conducted to identify the relevant articles published up to January 2023. Studies reporting the treatment option of maxillofacial fractures in Iran were included in the analysis. MOOSE guidelines were adopted for the current systematic review. No data or language restriction were applied. Risk of bias across the articles was assessed.

Results: This systematic review included 13 articles with a total of 19,147 treated patients for maxillofacial fractures. ORIF was the most common type of treatment, but complications occurred in approximately 5% of cases. Mandible fractures were not statistically more treated by ORIF than closed reduction or conservative treatment, and no type of treatment was considered statistically preferable depending on the anatomical region affected by Iranian maxillofacial surgeons. The included studies were considered to have a low risk of bias, but many were not clear in reporting cross-referenced data regarding the type of treatment, which could be considered a major flaw.

Conclusion: Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the types of treatment used for maxillofacial fractures by Iranian surgeons and highlights the importance of clear reporting of data in research articles.

Keywords: Iran; Maxillofacial Fractures; Middle East; Prevalence; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of types of treatment according to included articles
Figure 2
Figure 2
Types of treatment of maxillofacial fractures in Iran
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias of the included articles on MOOSE guideline

References

    1. Wusiman P, Maimaitituerxun B, Guli, Saimaiti A, Moming A. Epidemiology and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31:e517–20. - PubMed
    1. Aslam-Pervez N, Lubek JE. Most cited publications in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;22:25–37. - PubMed
    1. Grillo R, Slusarenko da Silva Y, Tavares MG, Borba AM, Naclério-Homem M da G. Which sports have a higher risk of maxillofacial injuries? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;S2468-7855:00354–8. - PubMed
    1. Nogami S, Yamauchi K, Bottini GB, Morishima H, Sai Y, Otake Y, et al. Mandibular fractures and dental injuries sustained during baseball and softball over 14 years in a Japanese population: A retrospective multicentre study. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36:156–60. - PubMed
    1. Boffano P, Kommers SC, Karagozoglu KH, Forouzanfar T. Aetiology of maxillofacial fractures: A review of published studies during the last 30 years. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:901–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources