Spectrum, Procedural Feasibility, and the Value of a Surgeon's Opinion in Varying Gender-Affirming Surgeries
- PMID: 38130983
- PMCID: PMC10732170
- DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0214
Spectrum, Procedural Feasibility, and the Value of a Surgeon's Opinion in Varying Gender-Affirming Surgeries
Abstract
The understanding of gender has expanded contributing to gaps in gender-affirming care. Traditional gender-affirming surgeries focus on binary results, diminishing room for affirmation of other identities. Surgeons are faced with the challenge of deciding whether a variation of gender-affirming surgery can be safely performed per request. The ethical question of when a surgeon may say yes or no to these varying requests comes after the consideration of premorbid conditions, body habitus, age, social and family support, individuals' goals, and risk assessment. Preoperative evaluations must take into account surgical experience, barriers to care, increased risk profile, and the surgeon's personal biases.
Keywords: LGBTQ; gender care; gender dysphoria; gender-affirming surgery; transgender.
Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC; 1980.
-
- Brownstone LM, DeRieux J, Kelly DA, et al. . Body mass index requirements for gender-affirming surgeries are not empirically based. Transgend Health 2021;6(3):121–124; doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2020.0068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources