Evaluation of a chat GPT generated patient information leaflet about laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- PMID: 38131402
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.18834
Evaluation of a chat GPT generated patient information leaflet about laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in all aspects of life in information compilation and writing, and this includes healthcare. This study aimed to evaluate a Chat GPT generated patient information leaflet (PIL) against a surgeon generated version, in order to explore a potential application of this artificial intelligence language processing model.
Methods: Cross-sectional study, undertaken May to June 2023, asking two cohorts (patients and doctors) to complete a questionnaire evaluating a Chat GPT generated PIL and a surgeon generated PIL about laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were having laparoscopic cholecystectomy at large private Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and doctors were recruited from this hospital and a public quaternary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. The study included a convenience sample of 28 patients and 16 doctors. The main outcome measure was a questionnaire (maximum score out of 8) based on validated evaluation instrument for PILs.
Results: The study recruited 28 patients and 15 doctors to complete the questionnaire. The Chat GPT and surgeon generated PILs were scored similarly by patients (median 8 for both PIL; mean 7.5 for Chat GPT PIL vs. 7.1 for surgeon PIL). Doctors also scored both versions similarly, with slightly higher scores for Chat GPT over surgeon version (median 7 vs. 6; mean 6.7 vs. 5.6, respectively).
Conclusions: The Chat GPT generated PIL was assessed as being as good or slightly better than the surgeon generated version. This study shows that PIL are a feasible application of AI language processing models.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; general surgery; patient information; surgical education.
© 2023 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Sallam M. Chat GPT utility in healthcare education, research and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 887.
-
- Moult B, Franck L, Brady H. Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument of improve the quality of written health care information. Health Expect. 2004; 7: 165-175.
-
- Australian Medical Association. Automated Decision Making and AI Regulation; AMA Submission to the Prime Minister and Cabinet Consultation on Positioning Australia as the Leader in Digital Economy Regulation [PDF on Internet]. Canberra: Australian Medical Association; 2022. [Cited 3 July 2023.] Available from URL: https://www.ama.com.au/sites/default/files/2022-06/AMA%20Submission%20to....
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
