Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 15;8(8):613.
doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8080613.

Artificial Humic Substances as Biomimetics of Natural Analogues: Production, Characteristics and Preferences Regarding Their Use

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Humic Substances as Biomimetics of Natural Analogues: Production, Characteristics and Preferences Regarding Their Use

Elena Efremenko et al. Biomimetics (Basel). .

Abstract

Various processes designed for the humification (HF) of animal husbandry wastes, primarily bird droppings, reduce their volumes, solve environmental problems, and make it possible to obtain products with artificially formed humic substances (HSs) as analogues of natural HSs, usually extracted from fossil sources (coal and peat). This review studies the main characteristics of various biological and physicochemical methods of the HF of animal wastes (composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonation, acid or alkaline hydrolysis, and subcritical water extraction). A comparative analysis of the HF rates and HS yields in these processes, the characteristics of the resulting artificial HSs (humification index, polymerization index, degree of aromaticity, etc.) was carried out. The main factors (additives, process conditions, waste pretreatment, etc.) that can increase the efficiency of HF and affect the properties of HSs are highlighted. Based on the results of chemical composition analysis, the main trends and preferences with regard to the use of HF products as complex biomimetics are discussed.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; biosorbents; composting; hydrothermal carbonization; pyrolysis; waste treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The scheme used in this review for a comparative analysis of the main HF processes of AW under different conditions and the HS resources obtained in them.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-plot visualization of HS yields (a), HS production rates (b), and temperatures (c) in various processes of HF AW presented in Table 1. Designations: ◯—individual data point; ∎—mean value; the box confines the interquartile range (25–75%) and is sectioned by segment at median value; the whiskers denote the value of 1.5 interquartile range. The rectangles of different colors correspond to certain HF processes indicated on the abscissa axis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Properties of biomimetic HSs obtained via various methods and their practical potential.

References

    1. Lehmann J., Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature. 2015;528:60–68. doi: 10.1038/nature16069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerke J. Concepts and misconceptions of humic substances as the stable part of soil organic matter: A review. Agronomy. 2018;8:76. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8050076. - DOI
    1. Wang M., Li Y., Peng H., Wang J., Li Q., Li P., Fan J., Liu S., Zheng G. Review: Biotic and abiotic approaches to artificial humic acids production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023;187:113771. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113771. - DOI
    1. Chen Y., Inbar Y., Chefetz B., Hadar Y. Composting and recycling of organic wastes. In: Rosen D., Tel-Or E., Hadar Y., Chen Y., editors. Modern Agriculture and the Environment. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1997. p. 71. (Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences). - DOI
    1. Filho J.F.D.C.L., Thomason W.E., Evanylo G.K., Zhang X., Strickland M.S., Chim B.K., Diatta A.A. The synergistic effects of humic substances and biofertilizers on plant development and microbial activity: A review. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2020;32:56–75. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2020/v32i730306. - DOI