A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction
- PMID: 38133073
- PMCID: PMC10748093
- DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060169
A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is used in a wide range of medical imaging diagnoses. However, the reconstruction of CT images from raw projection data is inherently complex and is subject to artifacts and noise, which compromises image quality and accuracy. In order to address these challenges, deep learning developments have the potential to improve the reconstruction of computed tomography images. In this regard, our research aim is to determine the techniques that are used for 3D deep learning in CT reconstruction and to identify the training and validation datasets that are accessible. This research was performed on five databases. After a careful assessment of each record based on the objective and scope of the study, we selected 60 research articles for this review. This systematic literature review revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were the most suitable deep learning algorithms for CT reconstruction. Additionally, two major datasets appropriate for training and developing deep learning systems were identified: 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo and MSCT. These datasets are important resources for the creation and assessment of CT reconstruction models. According to the results, 3D deep learning may increase the effectiveness of CT image reconstruction, boost image quality, and lower radiation exposure. By using these deep learning approaches, CT image reconstruction may be made more precise and effective, improving patient outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare system productivity.
Keywords: 3D deep learning (3DDL); computed tomography (CT) reconstruction; systematic literature review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures








Similar articles
-
The effect of deep learning reconstruction on abdominal CT densitometry and image quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2921-2929. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08438-z. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34913104 Free PMC article.
-
Deep residual network-based projection interpolation and post-processing techniques for thoracic patient CBCT reconstruction.Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17953. doi: 10.1002/mp.17953. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40660879
-
The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(35):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15350. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21958472 Free PMC article.
-
A deep learning approach to direct immunofluorescence pattern recognition in autoimmune bullous diseases.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):261-266. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae142. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38581445
-
X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using neural attenuation field prior.Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17859. doi: 10.1002/mp.17859. Epub 2025 Apr 30. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40305006 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring the Application of the Artificial-Intelligence-Integrated Platform 3D Slicer in Medical Imaging Education.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;14(2):146. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020146. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38248022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Updates on Methods for Body Composition Analysis: Implications for Clinical Practice.Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Jan 11;14(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s13679-024-00593-w. Curr Obes Rep. 2025. PMID: 39798028 Review.
-
Explainable hybrid transformer for multi-classification of lung disease using chest X-rays.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;15(1):6650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90607-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39994381 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 10;61(6):1066. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061066. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40572754 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jonas D.E., Reuland D.S., Reddy S.M., Nagle M., Clark S.D., Weber R.P., Enyioha C., Malo T.L., Brenner A.T., Armstrong C., et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325:971–987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Awan D., Rehman H.U. Grid Load Balancing Using Parallel Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2015;3:451–456.
-
- Greenwood J.P., Maredia N., Younger J.F., Brown J.M., Nixon J., Everett C.C., Bijsterveld P., Ridgway J.P., Radjenovic A., Dickinson C.J., et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): A prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- McKeon A., Apiwattanakul M., Lachance D.H., Lennon V.A., Mandrekar J.N., Boeve B.F., Mullan B., Mokri B., Britton J.W., Drubach D.A., et al. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography in paraneoplastic neurologic disorders: Systematic analysis and review. Arch. Neurol. 2010;67:322–329. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.336. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources