A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction
- PMID: 38133073
- PMCID: PMC10748093
- DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060169
A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is used in a wide range of medical imaging diagnoses. However, the reconstruction of CT images from raw projection data is inherently complex and is subject to artifacts and noise, which compromises image quality and accuracy. In order to address these challenges, deep learning developments have the potential to improve the reconstruction of computed tomography images. In this regard, our research aim is to determine the techniques that are used for 3D deep learning in CT reconstruction and to identify the training and validation datasets that are accessible. This research was performed on five databases. After a careful assessment of each record based on the objective and scope of the study, we selected 60 research articles for this review. This systematic literature review revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were the most suitable deep learning algorithms for CT reconstruction. Additionally, two major datasets appropriate for training and developing deep learning systems were identified: 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo and MSCT. These datasets are important resources for the creation and assessment of CT reconstruction models. According to the results, 3D deep learning may increase the effectiveness of CT image reconstruction, boost image quality, and lower radiation exposure. By using these deep learning approaches, CT image reconstruction may be made more precise and effective, improving patient outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare system productivity.
Keywords: 3D deep learning (3DDL); computed tomography (CT) reconstruction; systematic literature review.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures








References
-
- Jonas D.E., Reuland D.S., Reddy S.M., Nagle M., Clark S.D., Weber R.P., Enyioha C., Malo T.L., Brenner A.T., Armstrong C., et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325:971–987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Awan D., Rehman H.U. Grid Load Balancing Using Parallel Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2015;3:451–456.
-
- Greenwood J.P., Maredia N., Younger J.F., Brown J.M., Nixon J., Everett C.C., Bijsterveld P., Ridgway J.P., Radjenovic A., Dickinson C.J., et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): A prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- McKeon A., Apiwattanakul M., Lachance D.H., Lennon V.A., Mandrekar J.N., Boeve B.F., Mullan B., Mokri B., Britton J.W., Drubach D.A., et al. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography in paraneoplastic neurologic disorders: Systematic analysis and review. Arch. Neurol. 2010;67:322–329. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.336. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources