Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 22;11(12):231.
doi: 10.3390/sports11120231.

Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Cohesion within the Sport and Physical Activity Context: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Conceptualisation and Measurement of Social Cohesion within the Sport and Physical Activity Context: A Scoping Review

Louis Moustakas et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

Sport, physical activity and social cohesion are increasingly linked within the academic literature. Indeed, studies recognise both the importance of social cohesion for promoting physical activity and the potential of sport to support social cohesion. Up until now, however, the ways in which social cohesion has been defined and measured in the context of sport and physical activity have not been the subject of much academic attention. Through a scoping review of studies measuring social cohesion in the sport and physical activity context, we aim to uncover how social cohesion is defined and measured, thus allowing us to better grasp how the concept is understood and operationalised in this field. As such, full-text inclusion occurred when studies quantitatively measured social cohesion through a questionnaire/survey instrument in connection with sport or physical activity participation or within programmes using sport to foster social cohesion. A total of 40 papers were included in the review, showing broad support for the argument that social cohesion is positively related to sport or physical activity participation. However, the retained texts engage on only a surface level with the concept of social cohesion, with around half not defining the term and the associated measurement tools using only a fraction of the dimensions typically associated with social cohesion. To conclude, we propose future directions to enhance conceptual engagement with and measurement of social cohesion.

Keywords: measurement; social capital; sport for development; sport for social cohesion; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prisma Flow Chart for Scoping Review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dimensions of Social Cohesion captured by measurement tools within selected articles.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stigendal M. Cities and Social Cohesion: Popularizing the Results of Social Polis. Malmo University; Malmö, Sweden: 2010. Mapius No. 6.
    1. Dayrit M.M., Mendoza R.U. Social cohesion vs COVID-19. Int. J. Health Gov. 2020;25:191–203. doi: 10.1108/IJHG-03-2020-0022. - DOI
    1. Razavi S., Behrendt C., Bierbaum M., Orton I., Tessier L. Reinvigorating the social contract and strengthening social cohesion: Social protection responses to COVID-19. Int. Soc. Secur. Rev. 2020;73:55–80. doi: 10.1111/issr.12245. - DOI
    1. Moustakas L. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Social Cohesion from 1994–2020. Publications. 2022;10:5. doi: 10.3390/publications10010005. - DOI
    1. Moustakas L., Robrade D. Sport for Social Cohesion: From Scoping Review to New Research Directions. Sport Soc. 2023;26:1301–1318. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2022.2130049. - DOI

Publication types