Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 5;11(12):987.
doi: 10.3390/toxics11120987.

Assessment of Biofilm Growth on Microplastics in Freshwaters Using a Passive Flow-Through System

Affiliations

Assessment of Biofilm Growth on Microplastics in Freshwaters Using a Passive Flow-Through System

Chengyang Jiang et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

Biofilms that colonize on the surface of microplastics (MPs) in freshwaters may pose a potential health risk. This study examined factors that influence MP-associated biofilm growth, including polymer type, degree of weathering, and source water quality. Weathered MPs produced in-lab were employed in biofilm trials conducted on site using a passive flow-through system with raw water at drinking water treatment facility intakes. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was used to quantify biofilm abundance; biofilm composition was assessed via metagenomic sequencing. Biofilm growth was observed on all polymer types examined and most prevalent on polyvinyl chloride (PVC), where ATP levels were 6 to 12 times higher when compared to other polymers. Pathogen-containing species including Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli were present on all polymers with relative abundance up to 13.7%. S. enterica was selectively enriched on weathered MPs in specific water matrices. These findings support the need to research the potential accumulation of pathogenic organisms on microplastic surfaces.

Keywords: ATP; HDPE; LDPE; PET; PP; PVC; biofilm; freshwater; metagenomics; weathering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ATP associated with five virgin polymer types and four source waters. Vertical bars indicate maximum and minimum values, boxes indicate upper and lower quartiles, “×” indicates mean value, “−” indicates median. n = 6 for Otonabee River and n = 8 for all others.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between (virgin) PVC-associated ATP concentrations and source water as characterized by DOC, 8 samples collected over 16 weeks for Lake Ontario and Grand River (upstream and downstream), and 6 samples collected over 21 weeks for Otonabee River. Vertical bars represent ± one standard deviation (n = 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ATP concentrations associated with virgin and weathered polymers in three water matrices; “8 wk” or “16 wk” indicate exposure time in weeks, “V” = virgin, “W” = weathered; vertical bars indicate ± 1 standard deviation (Lake Ontario: DOC = 1.72–4.25 mg/L, temperature = 9.1–20.6 °C; Grand River (upstream): DOC = 5.31–13.15 mg/L, temperature = 5.9–28.1 °C; Grand River (downstream): DOC = 3.92–6.55 mg/L, temperature = 9.9–24.3 °C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phylum-level relative abundance within MP-associated biofilms. Selected polymer–source water combinations include 16- and 21-week virgin polymers and Otonabee River, and 8-week virgin and weathered polymers and Grand River (downstream).
Figure 5
Figure 5
PCoA plots of biofilm communities based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, ellipses created at 95% confidence based on (a) polymer type and (b) source water.

References

    1. Frias J.P.G.L., Nash R. Microplastics: Finding a Consensus on the Definition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019;138:145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The California Water Board . Adoption of Definition of “Microplastics in Drinking Water”. The California Water Board; Sacramento, CA, USA: 2020.
    1. Alimi O.S., Farner Budarz J., Hernandez L.M., Tufenkji N. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Aquatic Environments: Aggregation, Deposition, and Enhanced Contaminant Transport. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:1704–1724. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05559. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shen M., Song B., Zhu Y., Zeng G., Zhang Y., Yang Y., Wen X., Chen M., Yi H. Removal of Microplastics via Drinking Water Treatment: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Chemosphere. 2020;251:126612. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Triebskorn R., Braunbeck T., Grummt T., Hanslik L., Huppertsberg S., Jekel M., Knepper T.P., Krais S., Müller Y.K., Pittroff M., et al. Relevance of Nano- and Microplastics for Freshwater Ecosystems: A Critical Review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019;110:375–392. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.023. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources