Resectability versus Operability in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- PMID: 38133722
- DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01477-3
Resectability versus Operability in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Abstract
Purpose of review: With increased detection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to screening, determining optimal management increasingly hinges on assessing resectability and operability. Resectability refers to the feasibility of achieving microscopically negative margins based on tumour size, location and degree of local invasion and achieving an anatomical lobar resection. Operability reflects the patient's tolerance for resection based on comorbidities, cardiopulmonary reserve and frailty. Standardized criteria help guide these assessments, but application variability contributes to practice inconsistencies. This review synthesizes a strategic approach to evaluating resectability and operability in contemporary practice. Standardization promises reduced care variability and optimized patient selection to maximize curative outcomes in this new era of early detection.
Recent findings: Recent pivotal trials demonstrate equivalency of sublobar resection to lobectomy for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC, expanding options for parenchymal preservation in borderline surgical candidates. Furthermore, recent phase 3 trials have highlighted the benefit of chemoimmunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment with an excellent pathological response and a down staging of the tumour, improving the resectability of the early-stage NSCLC. A good assessment of the operability and resectability is paramount in order to offer the best course of treatment for our patients. European and American societies have issued recommendations to help clinicians assess the cardiopulmonary function and predict the extension of pulmonary resection that could afford the patient. This operability assessment is closely linked with the evaluated tumour resectability which will determine the extension of pulmonary resection that is needed for the patient in order to achieve a good oncological outcome. Some major progresses have been done recently to improve the operability and resectability of patients. For instance, prehabilitation program allows better postoperative morbidity. Some studies have shown a potential good oncological outcome with sublobar resection expending access to surgery for patient with reduced lung function. Some others have identified the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy as a potential solution for downstaging tumours. Work-up of early-stage NSCLC is a key moment and has to be done thoroughly and in full knowledge of the recent findings in order to propose the most appropriate treatment for the patient.
Keywords: Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer; Lung segmentectomy; Non-small cell lung cancer surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e278S-e313S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2359. Chest. 2013. PMID: 23649443
-
Sublobar resections in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: segmentectomies result in significantly better cancer-related survival than wedge resections.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr;33(4):728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.048. Epub 2008 Feb 7. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18261918
-
Oncological Outcomes of Lobar Resection, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection for T1a Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Autumn;32(3):582-590. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 9. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31401180
-
Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer ≤ 2 cm: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2023 Dec;75(8):2343-2354. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01627-z. Epub 2023 Aug 10. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 37563486
-
Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in Surgical Treatment of Elderly Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (STEPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2016 Apr 7;17:191. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1312-6. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27053091 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Perioperative immunochemotherapy in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: insights on the path forward.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 May 30;14(5):1882-1886. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-202. Epub 2025 May 28. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 40535080 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
An Updated Review of Management of Resectable Stage III NSCLC in the Era of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;16(7):1302. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071302. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38610980 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
-
- Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, Senan S, Waller DA, Vansteenkiste J, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):11–21.
-
- Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WEE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2016;11(1):39–51.
-
- National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials