Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 30;10(12):1882.
doi: 10.3390/children10121882.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Status and Future Application

Affiliations
Review

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Status and Future Application

Ludmilla Bazin et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

The posterior minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) approach-or the paraspinal muscle approach-for posterior spinal fusion and segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was first reported in 2011. It is less invasive than the traditionally used open posterior midline approach, which is associated with significant morbidity, including denervation of the paraspinal muscles, significant blood loss, and a large midline skin incision. The literature suggests that the MISS approach, though technically challenging and with a longer operative time, provides similar levels of deformity correction, lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, better pain outcomes, and a faster return to sports than the open posterior midline approach. Correction maintenance and fusion rates also seem to be equivalent for both approaches. This narrative review presents the results of relevant publications reporting on spinal segmental instrumentation using pedicle screws and posterior spinal fusion as part of an MISS approach. It then compares them with the results of the traditional open posterior midline approach for treating AIS. It specifically examines perioperative morbidity and radiological and clinical outcomes with a minimal follow-up length of 2 years (range 2-9 years).

Keywords: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; correction; paraspinal muscle approach; posterior instrumentation and fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Preoperative skin marking of the vertebrae, the pedicles, and the three skin incisions. (b) MISS exposure performed on the left lumbar area, with exposure of the facet joints.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) The pedicle screws are in place. (b) The reduction tubes are fixed on the pedicle screw heads.

References

    1. Asher M.A., Burton D.C. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Natural History and Long Term Treatment Effects. Scoliosis. 2006;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willner S., Udén A. A Prospective Prevalence Study of Scoliosis in Southern Sweden. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1982;53:233–237. doi: 10.3109/17453678208992208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogala E.J., Drummond D.S., Gurr J. Scoliosis: Incidence and Natural History. A Prospective Epidemiological Study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1978;60:173–176. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197860020-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luk K.D.K., Lee C.F., Cheung K.M.C., Cheng J.C.Y., Ng B.K.W., Lam T.P., Mak K.H., Yip P.S.F., Fong D.Y.T. Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Large Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Spine. 2010;35:1607–1614. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pesenti S., Jouve J.-L., Morin C., Wolff S., Sales De Gauzy J., Chalopin A., Ibnoulkhatib A., Polirsztok E., Walter A., Schuller S., et al. Evolution of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Results of a Multicenter Study at 20 Years’ Follow-Up. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2015;101:619–622. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources