Preterm-Born Young Women Have Weaker Hand Grip Strength Compared to Their Full-Term-Born Peers
- PMID: 38136100
- PMCID: PMC10741946
- DOI: 10.3390/children10121898
Preterm-Born Young Women Have Weaker Hand Grip Strength Compared to Their Full-Term-Born Peers
Abstract
Prematurity has been linked to lower muscular fitness and increased morbidity across the human lifespan. Hand grip strength is widely used as a measure of muscle strength. Previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the role of vitamin D in hand grip strength. Here, we investigated hand grip strength and the effects of a yearlong vitamin D supplementation in healthy preterm-born young adults. We recruited 38 young adults born preterm at either ≤32 weeks' gestation or <34 weeks' gestation and weighing <1500 g, as well as 39 gender- and age-matched controls, for this study. Anthropometric measurements, hand grip strengths, and vitamin D concentrations were recorded. These investigations were repeated after a yearlong vitamin D supplementation intervention. There was a significant difference in the age- and gender-specific hand grip strength ranks between the preterm- and full-term-born young adults: 57.9% and 30.7%, respectively, were below average (p = 0.009). In the preterm-born group, the females had significantly lower hand grip strengths compared to their full-term-born peers, with a mean difference of -3.46 kg (95% CI: -6.68 to -0.247; p = 0.035). In a linear regression analysis, the preterm-born female adult height was negatively associated with hand grip strength (R2 = 0.24, F (1.43) = 13.61, p < 0.001). The vitamin D concentrations were increased after the supplementation period, with no association with hand grip strength. According to our results, preterm-born young females are at risk for lower muscle strength, independent of their current vitamin D status.
Keywords: hand grip strength; muscle strength; preterm birth; vitamin D.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Ohuma E.O., Moller A., Bradley E., Chakwera S., Hussain-Alkhateeb L., Lewin A., Okwaraji Y.B., Mahanani W.R., Johansson E.W., Lavin T., et al. National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: A systematic analysis. Lancet. 2023;402:1261–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stoelhorst G.M.S.J., Rijken M., Martens S.E., Brand R., den Ouden L.A., Wit J.-M., Veen S. Changes in Neonatology: Comparison of Two Cohorts of Very Preterm Infants (Gestational Age < 32 Weeks): The Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and The Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996–1997. Pediatrics. 2005;115:396–405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
