Tools and Methods for Diagnosing Developmental Dysgraphia in the Digital Age: A State of the Art
- PMID: 38136127
- PMCID: PMC10741997
- DOI: 10.3390/children10121925
Tools and Methods for Diagnosing Developmental Dysgraphia in the Digital Age: A State of the Art
Abstract
Handwriting is a complex perceptual motor task that requires years of training and practice before complete mastery. Its acquisition is crucial, since handwriting is the basis, together with reading, of the acquisition of higher-level skills such as spelling, grammar, syntax, and text composition. Despite the correct learning and practice of handwriting, some children never master this skill to a sufficient level. These handwriting deficits, referred to as developmental dysgraphia, can seriously impact the acquisition of other skills and thus the academic success of the child if they are not diagnosed and handled early. In this review, we present a non-exhaustive listing of the tools that are the most reported in the literature for the analysis of handwriting and the diagnosis of dysgraphia. A variety of tools focusing on either the final handwriting product or the handwriting process are described here. On one hand, paper-and-pen tools are widely used throughout the world to assess handwriting quality and/or speed, but no universal gold-standard diagnostic test exists. On the other hand, several very promising computerized tools for the diagnosis of dysgraphia have been developed in the last decade, but some improvements are required before they can be available to clinicians. Based on these observations, we will discuss the pros and cons of the existing tools and the perspectives related to the development of a universal, standardized test of dysgraphia combining both paper-and-pen and computerized approaches and including different graphomotor and writing tasks.
Keywords: developmental dysgraphia; diagnosis; handwriting; process; product.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Dysgraphia Differs Between Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder and/or Reading Disorder.J Learn Disabil. 2024 Nov-Dec;57(6):397-410. doi: 10.1177/00222194231223528. Epub 2024 Jan 29. J Learn Disabil. 2024. PMID: 38284390
-
Automated human-level diagnosis of dysgraphia using a consumer tablet.NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 31;1:42. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0049-x. eCollection 2018. NPJ Digit Med. 2018. PMID: 31304322 Free PMC article.
-
Developmental dysgraphia: An overview and framework for research.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 May-Jun;34(3-4):65-82. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1369016. Epub 2017 Sep 14. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017. PMID: 28906176 Free PMC article.
-
From Motor Skills to Digital Solutions: Developmental Dysgraphia Interventions over Two Decades.Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;12(5):542. doi: 10.3390/children12050542. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40426721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Empowering students with dysgraphia: the educational benefits of assistive technologies.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 23:1-12. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2493737. Online ahead of print. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025. PMID: 40266080 Review.
Cited by
-
DysDiTect: Dyslexia Identification Using CNN-Positional-LSTM-Attention Modeling with Chinese Dictation Task.Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 29;14(5):444. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050444. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38790423 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cutler L., Graham S. Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. J. Educ. Psychol. 2008;100:907–919. doi: 10.1037/a0012656. - DOI
-
- McMaster E., Roberts T. Handwriting in 2015: A main occupation for primary school–aged children in the classroom? J. Occup. Ther. Schools Early Interv. 2016;9:38. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2016.1141084. - DOI
-
- Jones D., Christensen C.A. Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. J. Educ. Psychol. 1999;91:44. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44. - DOI
-
- Danna J., Longcamp M., Nalborczyk L., Velay J.-L., Commengé C., Jover M. Interaction between orthographic and graphomotor constraints in learning to write. Learn. Instruct. 2022;80:101622. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101622. - DOI
-
- Pinto G., Incognito O. The relationship between emergent drawing, emergent writing, and visual-motor intergraion in preschool children. Infant Child Dev. 2022;31:e2284. doi: 10.1002/icd.2284. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous